Cisco Exam 300-510 Topic 9 Question 84 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-510 exam

Question #: 84
Topic #: 9

Refer to the exhibit.

A network operator is troubleshooting TE tunnels and discovers that the soft preemption is not working as desired. Where should the soft preemption be applied to solve the issue?

Aon the tail-end device for tunnel-te1 192.168.0.7

Bunder the tunnel-te1 interface on PE1

Cexplicitly for tunnel-te 1 under the Cisco MPLS TE configuration mode after the timeout setting

DUnder the interface Loopback0 necessary for this deployment type.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Tamar at Apr 23, 2024, 07:58 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-510 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Elvera

2 months ago

I'm just going to guess C and hope for the best. Cisco configurations always make me feel like I'm solving a riddle.

upvoted 0 times

Kathrine

4 days ago

User 3: Let's go with C and see if it solves the issue with soft preemption.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephanie

9 days ago

User 2: Yeah, I agree. Cisco configurations can be tricky sometimes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cecil

21 days ago

User 1: I think C is the correct answer. Let's try that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laurel

2 months ago

Under the interface Loopback0? Really? That's just silly. This has nothing to do with the Loopback interface.

upvoted 0 times

Tayna

11 days ago

C) explicitly for tunnel-te 1 under the Cisco MPLS TE configuration mode after the timeout setting

upvoted 0 times

...

Kirk

16 days ago

B) under the tunnel-te1 interface on PE1

upvoted 0 times

...

Lovetta

17 days ago

A) on the tail-end device for tunnel-te1 192.168.0.7

upvoted 0 times

...

Alyssa

2 months ago

Haha, of course it's explicitly for tunnel-te 1 under the Cisco MPLS TE configuration mode after the timeout setting. How else would you do it?

upvoted 0 times

...

Vincent

2 months ago

I'm not so sure about that. Applying the soft preemption under the tunnel-te1 interface on PE1 seems more appropriate to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Thaddeus

2 months ago

The soft preemption should be applied on the tail-end device for tunnel-te1 192.168.0.7. That's the most logical place to handle the issue.

upvoted 0 times

Page

2 months ago

User 2: I agree, that seems like the best solution for the issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Janine

2 months ago

User 1: I think the soft preemption should be applied on the tail-end device for tunnel-te1 192.168.0.7.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eun

2 months ago

But wouldn't explicitly configuring it for tunnel-te 1 under the Cisco MPLS TE configuration mode after the timeout setting be more effective?

upvoted 0 times

...

Jani

2 months ago

I disagree, I believe it should be under the tunnel-te1 interface on PE1.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eun

2 months ago

I think the soft preemption should be applied on the tail-end device for tunnel-te1 192.168.0.7.

upvoted 0 times

...