Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-510 Topic 8 Question 85 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-510 exam
Question #: 85
Topic #: 8
[All 300-510 Questions]

In a PIM-SM environment, which mechanism determines the traffic that a receiver receives?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Alona
1 months ago
I bet the Alona would choose the answer that involves the most flooding. The more traffic, the merrier!
upvoted 0 times
...
Keith
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm stumped. Maybe I should've paid more attention in my PIM-SM class. This is trickier than I thought.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
2 months ago
Nah, I'm going with C. The RP flooding traffic out of all PIM interfaces sounds like the way to go. Why limit the receiver, right?
upvoted 0 times
Shantay
7 days ago
I agree with you, C seems like the most efficient way to handle traffic in a PIM-SM environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gabriele
14 days ago
I'm not sure, I think A might be a better choice. The receiver can request specific traffic from the RP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynna
1 months ago
I think C is the best option too. Let's go with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Myrtie
2 months ago
I'm not so sure. I was leaning towards D, where the receiver requests traffic from each desired source. Seems more flexible than just the RP, no?
upvoted 0 times
Royal
1 months ago
C) The RP on the shared tree floods traffic out of all PIM configured interfaces.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
1 months ago
B) The receiver explicitly requests traffic from a single source, which responds by forwarding all traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariann
1 months ago
A) The receiver explicitly requests its desired traffic from the RP on the shared tree.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nadine
2 months ago
I think the correct answer is A. The receiver explicitly requests its desired traffic from the RP on the shared tree. It makes the most sense in a PIM-SM environment.
upvoted 0 times
Theresia
17 days ago
I believe option B could work as well, depending on how the receiver wants to receive traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristine
1 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option C might be the correct mechanism.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawnda
1 months ago
I think option D could also be a possibility, depending on the specific scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaquana
2 months ago
I agree, option A seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glen
2 months ago
Hmm, that makes sense too. It could be B then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nu
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B. The receiver requests traffic from a single source.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glen
2 months ago
I think the answer is A, because the receiver requests its desired traffic from the RP.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77