Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-510 Topic 6 Question 81 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-510 exam
Question #: 81
Topic #: 6
[All 300-510 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Routers R1, R2. R3, and R4 have been configured to run OSPF. and router R5 is running EIGRP Traffic from R1 to R5 is expected to pass via R4. but OSPF routing has calculated the best path via R3. Which action corrects the problem?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Valentin
1 months ago
This question is making my head spin, but at least it's not as bad as the one with the dancing llamas.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yong
1 months ago
Metric-type 1 with a higher metric on R3? Sounds like a classic case of 'the solution is right in front of you, but you just can't see it.'
upvoted 0 times
Alayna
12 days ago
User 1: Maybe configuring R1 with a static route to R5 would be a better solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Justine
1 months ago
Reconfiguring R1 in Area 0 could be the key, but I wonder if that might introduce other issues. Decisions, decisions!
upvoted 0 times
Jovita
6 days ago
D) Change the metric-type value on R3 to 2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maurine
19 days ago
Reconfiguring R1 in Area 0 could be the key, but I wonder if that might introduce other issues. Decisions, decisions!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
21 days ago
A) Configure R3 to use metric-type 1 with a higher metric than R4.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jacob
1 months ago
Configuring a static route on R1 seems like a good workaround, but I'm curious if that's the most elegant solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
2 months ago
This question is tricky! I'm not sure if changing the metric-type on R3 is the best solution, but it's worth a try.
upvoted 0 times
Katina
23 hours ago
D) Changing the metric-type value on R3 to 2 could also work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
2 days ago
B) I think configuring R1 with a static route to R5 networks might be a better solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josphine
3 days ago
A) Configure R3 to use metric-type 1 with a higher metric than R4.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Julianna
2 months ago
But wouldn't reconfiguring R1 in Area 0 also solve the problem?
upvoted 0 times
...
Polly
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the best option is to configure R1 with a static route to the R5 networks and set R5 as the next hop.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julianna
3 months ago
I think the correct action is to configure R3 to use metric-type 1 with a higher metric than R4.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77