Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-510 Topic 6 Question 107 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-510 exam
Question #: 107
Topic #: 6
[All 300-510 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit. After a recent network implementation project, customer A is performing stress testing to verify network redundancy at the branch office connected to R4. When the link from R2 is shut own as shown, the SLA tracking object fails and the cost of the link between R2 and R4 increases to 100. However, a traceroute operation from a PC in the Branch office shows that traffic to HQ is still routed via R2. Which solution corrects the problem and optimizes traffic flow via R3 without creating operational overhead?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Elliot
9 days ago
Virtual channel? Sounds fancy. I'm sold, D it is. As long as it doesn't require me to juggle more IP addresses, I'm happy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dewitt
12 days ago
Ah, the good old OSPF processes on R2 and R3. Classic networking solution, but I bet it'll work like a charm. A all the way!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
20 days ago
That could work too, but it might create operational overhead. I still think C) is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronald
21 days ago
B looks good to me. Redistributing routes from BGP to OSPF as type E1 should do the trick. Why complicate things when you can just use the existing protocols?
upvoted 0 times
Kristine
4 days ago
But wouldn't creating a virtual channel from R3 to R4 be a more direct approach?
upvoted 0 times
...
Josefa
6 days ago
I agree, option B seems like the simplest solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Devora
22 days ago
But wouldn't creating a virtual channel from R3 to R4 be a better solution?
upvoted 0 times
...
Francine
24 days ago
I think C is the way to go. Extending Area 10 to the link between R2 and R3 will ensure the traffic is routed through the redundant path without any issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
24 days ago
The answer is clearly D. Creating a virtual channel from R3 to R4 will optimize the traffic flow without any operational overhead. Simple and elegant solution.
upvoted 0 times
Marvel
2 days ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C. Using multiarea adjacency to extend Area 10 to the link between R2 and R3 makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alison
18 days ago
I think the answer is A. Configuring two OSPF processes on R2 and R3 seems like the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dahlia
26 days ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) Use multiarea adjacency to extend Area 10 to the link between R2 and R3.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
30 days ago
I think the answer is A) Configure two OSPF processes on R2 and R3 and redistribute traffic between them.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77