Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco Exam 300-510 Topic 2 Question 78 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-510 exam
Question #: 78
Topic #: 2
[All 300-510 Questions]

The ISP_A network is configured with PIMv2 with sparse mode. The engineering team at ISP_A must implement multicast support following RFC 5059 in the network. The RP priority will be 0, and the solution must require limited supervision from the operations team. Which action must the team take to meet the requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Adell at Dec 25, 2023, 10:47 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-510 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Whitney
1 years ago
What about Anycast-RP? That could work too, right? It would provide redundancy and still be a relatively hands-off approach for the ops team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmad
1 years ago
Yeah, I agree with Chan. Static RP is probably the way to go here. It's the most straightforward solution and meets the requirement of limited supervision from the ops team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chan
1 years ago
Haha, yeah, Anycast-RP is like bringing a bazooka to a knife fight. Let's keep it simple, folks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doug
1 years ago
Hmm, good point Tom. Anycast-RP could be an option, but it might be overkill for this scenario. Static RP just seems like the simplest and most direct solution.
upvoted 0 times
Kristofer
1 years ago
Great, I'll start working on implementing Static RP across all routers in the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
1 years ago
Yes, let's go with option B for simplicity and limited supervision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonzo
1 years ago
So, are we all agreeing on implementing Static RP then?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharmaine
1 years ago
That's true, we need a solution that requires minimal intervention from the operations team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Davida
1 years ago
I see your point, but Anycast-RP might be too complex for limited supervision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valene
1 years ago
But shouldn't we consider Anycast-RP as well for better scalability?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ricki
1 years ago
I think we should go with option B and implement Static RP.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77