Cisco Exam 300-510 Topic 11 Question 80 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-510 exam

Question #: 80
Topic #: 11

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit. Unified MPLS is implemented on this network to provide end-to-end services A network engineer noticed that R3 is failing to receive labels from R1 However, R2 is receiving labels from R1 R3 can ping R1 normally Which action resolves the issue?

AAdd the cdp run command to the link configuration between R1 and R3.

BAdd the send-label keyword in the R1 neighbor statement for R3.

CConfigure R1 to run Unified MPLS on both interfaces.

DDisable mpls Ip on the link between R1 and R3

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Stephaine at Feb 14, 2024, 12:37 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-510 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Diego

1 years ago

I'm inclined to choose option C. Configuring R1 to run Unified MPLS on both interfaces might be the solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vivan

1 years ago

But if we disable MPLS IP, wouldn't that impact other parts of the network as well?

upvoted 0 times

...

Simona

1 years ago

I don't agree with that. I believe the correct answer is D. We should disable MPLS IP on the link between R1 and R3.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vivan

1 years ago

I think the answer is B. Adding the send-label keyword in the R1 neighbor statement for R3 should resolve the issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vincenza

1 years ago

That's a good point, Nydia. I was also considering that option. It makes sense that we need to explicitly tell R1 to send labels to R3, since it's not happening automatically.

upvoted 0 times

Queenie

1 years ago

Sounds like a plan. Let's go ahead and implement the fix.

upvoted 0 times

...

Theola

1 years ago

After that, we can verify if R3 is now receiving the labels correctly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Roxane

1 years ago

Great, let's make that configuration change on R1 then.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lisha

1 years ago

Once that change is made, R3 should start receiving labels properly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Emmett

1 years ago

I agree. R1 needs to be explicitly configured to send labels to R3.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sueann

1 years ago

That should definitely do the trick.

upvoted 0 times

...

Andrew

1 years ago

B) Add the send-label keyword in the R1 neighbor statement for R3.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nydia

1 years ago

I'm leaning towards option B - adding the 'send-label' keyword in the R1 neighbor statement for R3. That seems like it could be the missing piece to get the labels flowing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paris

1 years ago

Yeah, I agree. It's strange that R3 can ping R1 normally, but not receive the labels. The question is asking about the action to resolve the issue, so we need to carefully consider the options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Murray

1 years ago

Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'm not sure why R3 is not receiving labels from R1, but it's good that R2 is getting them. Maybe there's something specific about the configuration between R1 and R3 that's causing the issue.

upvoted 0 times

...