Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco Exam 300-510 Topic 1 Question 101 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-510 exam
Question #: 101
Topic #: 1
[All 300-510 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit. A network engineer is investigating a report of packet drops in an application running on a server connected to PE2 The engineer determined that:

The OSPF adjacency in area 0 is up. and it is learning the loopback addresses of all routers in area 0.

Traffic from users connected to PE1 to the application is also passing normally.

Packets from PE2 back to PE1 are being dropped

Which action resolves the issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Veronique at Nov 17, 2024, 12:26 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-510 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Tequila
7 months ago
Yes, I believe selecting Option C could potentially resolve the packet drop issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quinn
7 months ago
Well, well, well, looks like we've got a case of the old 'packets going the wrong way' problem. I'd say Option A is the way to go, but hey, what do I know? I'm just the guy who's always fixing the network with duct tape and paperclips.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelle
7 months ago
I agree, maybe there is a problem with the OSPF setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathrine
7 months ago
Haha, Option D is just too funny. Resetting the entire network? That's like using a sledgehammer to kill a fly. Let's try something a little more surgical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
7 months ago
I think Option B is the way to go. Configuring a loopback interface on PE2 and advertising it in OSPF should help establish the connectivity.
upvoted 0 times
Shawn
5 months ago
Let's go with Option B then. It seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
5 months ago
I'm not sure about Option A, but Option B does sound promising.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lang
6 months ago
But what about Option A? Do you think that could also work?
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
6 months ago
I agree, Option B seems like the best solution here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
6 months ago
I'm not sure, but Option C could also be worth considering. It might address the issue with packets being dropped.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaclyn
6 months ago
I think Option A might work better. Maybe adjusting some OSPF settings could resolve the packet drops.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leigha
6 months ago
I agree, Option B seems like the best solution. Configuring a loopback interface on PE2 could definitely help.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tequila
7 months ago
I think the issue might be related to the routing configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noah
7 months ago
The issue seems to be with the packets from PE2 back to PE1 being dropped. Option C looks promising as it suggests adding a static route, which could help resolve the problem.
upvoted 0 times
Micheal
6 months ago
Good idea, let's implement it and see if it resolves the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
6 months ago
Let's go with Option C then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Telma
7 months ago
Agreed, adding a static route might fix the packet drops.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyda
7 months ago
I think Option C is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77