Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-440 Topic 2 Question 3 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-440 exam
Question #: 3
Topic #: 2
[All 300-440 Questions]

A company with multiple branch offices wants a suitable connectivity model to meet these network architecture requirements:

* high availability

* quality of service (QoS)

* multihoming

* specific routing needs

Which connectivity model meets these requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

A fully meshed topology with SD-WAN technology using dynamic routing and prioritized traffic for QoS meets the network architecture requirements of the company. A fully meshed topology provides high availability by eliminating single points of failure and allowing multiple paths between branch offices. SD-WAN technology enables multihoming by supporting multiple transport options, such as MPLS, internet, LTE, etc. SD-WAN also provides QoS by applying policies to prioritize traffic based on application, user, or network conditions. Dynamic routing allows the SD-WAN solution to adapt to changing network conditions and optimize the path selection for each traffic type. A fully meshed topology with SD-WAN technology can also support specific routing needs, such as segment routing, policy-based routing, or application-aware routing.Reference:

Designing and Implementing Cloud Connectivity (ENCC) v1.0

[Cisco SD-WAN Design Guide]

[Cisco SD-WAN Configuration Guide]


Contribute your Thoughts:

Colton
10 months ago
Interesting perspective. It's important to consider the specific routing needs of the company when making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
10 months ago
I see your point, but I think option A, hub-and-spoke with MPLS, offers dedicated bandwidth for QoS and static routing which can be beneficial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noel
10 months ago
I disagree. I believe option D, a fully meshed topology with SD-WAN, is the best choice for prioritized traffic and dynamic routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margo
10 months ago
That sounds like a good option. It offers the flexibility of SD-WAN while still utilizing the reliability of MPLS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colton
11 months ago
I think the company should go for option C, a hybrid topology combining MPLS and SD-WAN.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edison
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think D might be the best choice after hearing everyone's opinions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dwight
11 months ago
I think option B could also work well, with internet-based VPN connections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryln
11 months ago
I'm leaning towards option C, combining MPLS and SD-WAN for best of both worlds.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
11 months ago
I agree with Alaine, option D seems more flexible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
1 years ago
Really? I prefer option D with SD-WAN technology.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joaquin
1 years ago
I think option A sounds like a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edda
1 years ago
Haha, can you imagine trying to set up a fully meshed SD-WAN network? Talk about a headache! I mean, it might work, but the complexity would be off the charts. I'm with you guys, the hybrid MPLS/SD-WAN approach seems like the most sensible choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
1 years ago
You know, I was initially thinking the star topology with internet VPNs and BGP, but the more I think about it, that might not be robust enough for high availability. And the QoS could be tricky to guarantee over the public internet. I'd probably rule that one out.
upvoted 0 times
Gail
1 years ago
Great choice. I think it will provide the best network architecture for our company's branch offices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherly
1 years ago
That makes sense. Let's go with the fully meshed topology with SD-WAN for high availability and QoS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerrie
1 years ago
I'm leaning towards the fully meshed topology with SD-WAN. It seems like the most robust option for our needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aretha
1 years ago
What about the hub-and-spoke topology using MPLS with dedicated bandwidth for QoS? It might also meet the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
1 years ago
The hybrid topology that combines MPLS and SD-WAN could also be a good option. It offers a mix of technologies for flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jonelle
1 years ago
I think we should consider the fully meshed topology with SD-WAN technology. It provides dynamic routing and prioritized traffic for QoS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnna
1 years ago
I agree, the star topology with internet VPNs and BGP may not be the best option for high availability and QoS.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Annelle
1 years ago
I agree, the hybrid approach is probably the way to go here. MPLS can provide the reliability and QoS, while SD-WAN adds the flexibility and dynamic routing. Plus, you get that multihoming capability. Though I have to say, option D with the fully meshed SD-WAN also sounds tempting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noemi
1 years ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. We need a connectivity model that covers all those requirements - high availability, QoS, multihoming, and specific routing needs. I'm leaning towards option C, the hybrid topology combining MPLS and SD-WAN. That seems to give you the best of both worlds.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77