Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco Exam 300-430 Topic 7 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-430 exam
Question #: 41
Topic #: 7
[All 300-430 Questions]

A shopping center uses AireOS controllers with Cisco Wave 2 APs. A separate WLAN named Guest-012345678-WLAN is used for guest wireless clients. Management needs location analytics to determine popular areas. CMX must track only associated clients. What must be selected on the CMX server settings?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

by Glenn at Feb 26, 2023, 02:46 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-430 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Alysa
1 months ago
Wow, this question is so easy, it's almost laughable. Excluding probing clients is the way to go, no doubt about it. It's like they're not even trying to trick us here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Craig
2 months ago
Ah, the classic 'exclude probing clients' trick. Always works like a charm. I'm feeling good about this one.
upvoted 0 times
Chau
11 days ago
User 3: I agree, it's a classic trick that never fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
15 days ago
User 2: Yeah, that's the best choice for tracking only associated clients.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgeanna
28 days ago
User 1: I always go with option A) Exclude probing clients.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ettie
2 months ago
Hold up, Locally Administered MAC Filtering? That's just gonna make things more complicated. Let's go with the option that actually makes sense - Exclude probing clients.
upvoted 0 times
Talia
20 days ago
Definitely, let's keep it simple and just focus on tracking associated clients for location analytics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
22 days ago
Yeah, we don't want to overcomplicate things. Duty Cycle Cutoff doesn't seem relevant either.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kate
1 months ago
I agree, Locally Administered MAC Filtering seems unnecessary. Exclude probing clients is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marleen
2 months ago
Duty Cycle Cutoff? Nah, that's not gonna help us track associated clients. We need to enable Location MAC Filtering for this one.
upvoted 0 times
Lacresha
1 months ago
B: Enable Location MAC Filtering
upvoted 0 times
...
Pete
2 months ago
A: Duty Cycle Cutoff
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alonso
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm pretty sure we need to exclude probing clients to track only associated clients. Seems like the obvious choice here.
upvoted 0 times
Donte
1 months ago
D: I agree, excluding probing clients is the way to go for CMX tracking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
2 months ago
C: Definitely, it's important to filter out probing clients for accurate data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorcas
2 months ago
B: Agreed, that would ensure we track only associated clients for location analytics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
2 months ago
A: I think we should go with option A) Exclude probing clients.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kati
2 months ago
But wouldn't enabling Location MAC Filtering help track only associated clients for location analytics?
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonora
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is A) Exclude probing clients.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kati
3 months ago
I think the answer is D) Enable Location MAC Filtering.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77