Cisco Exam 300-430 Topic 5 Question 74 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-430 exam

Question #: 74
Topic #: 5

[All 300-430 Questions]

Which two events are outcomes of a successful RF jamming attack? (Choose two.)

Adisruption of WLAN services

Bunauthentication association

Cdeauthentication broadcast

Ddeauthentication multicast

Ephysical damage to AP hardware

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Jaclyn at Sep 14, 2024, 02:22 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-430 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Glenna

2 months ago

Hmm, I think I'll just go with the answer that doesn't involve setting off the fire sprinklers. A and C it is!

upvoted 0 times

Wai

5 days ago

Definitely best to avoid physical damage to the AP hardware!

upvoted 0 times

...

Sarah

6 days ago

E) physical damage to AP hardware

upvoted 0 times

...

Goldie

7 days ago

D) deauthentication multicast

upvoted 0 times

...

Delbert

8 days ago

B) unauthentication association

upvoted 0 times

...

Twana

10 days ago

Great choices! Those are the correct outcomes of a successful RF jamming attack.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carey

12 days ago

C) deauthentication broadcast

upvoted 0 times

...

Blythe

14 days ago

A) disruption of WLAN services

upvoted 0 times

...

Dalene

2 months ago

I'm going with A and C. Disrupting the WLAN and deauthenticating clients seems like the classic jamming move. Though I do wonder if there's a secret 'microwave the APs' option that I'm missing...

upvoted 0 times

...

Nu

2 months ago

Haha, E is the real answer! Just fry the AP hardware, problem solved. Though I guess that's more of a brute force approach than a 'successful' jamming attack.

upvoted 0 times

Judy

2 months ago

Haha, E is the real answer! Just fry the AP hardware, problem solved. Though I guess that's more of a brute force approach than a 'successful' jamming attack.

upvoted 0 times

...

Christiane

2 months ago

E) physical damage to AP hardware

upvoted 0 times

...

Sarah

2 months ago

A) disruption of WLAN services

upvoted 0 times

...

Laurel

2 months ago

I'm not sure about physical damage to AP hardware, but I think unauthentication association could be a possible outcome.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melvin

2 months ago

Wait, are you sure? I thought B and D were the right options - unauthentication association and deauthentication multicast. Isn't that how you take down a WLAN with jamming?

upvoted 0 times