Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-425 Topic 5 Question 83 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-425 exam
Question #: 83
Topic #: 5
[All 300-425 Questions]

Which non-Wi-Fi interferer can be identified by Metageek Chanalyzer?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Ellen
1 months ago
Ugh, this question is making my head spin. I feel like I'm back in my college physics class, trying to figure out which device is the biggest troublemaker for Wi-Fi networks. I'm gonna have to go with B) jammers, but I'm secretly hoping it's actually A) PDAs, just for the nostalgia factor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
1 months ago
Haha, this question is a real head-scratcher! I was tempted to go with A) PDAs, just because they seem like the most outdated option on the list. But I'm gonna have to go with the good ol' jammers. Can't beat those signal-disrupting devices!
upvoted 0 times
Micheline
2 days ago
I'm sticking with jammers. They seem like the most disruptive option on the list.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
7 days ago
I'm not so sure about jammers. I think smartphones could also be a non-Wi-Fi interferer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sang
20 days ago
I think jammers are the right answer too. They can really mess with the signal.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Colby
2 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I was leaning towards C) smartphones, since they can potentially interfere with Wi-Fi signals, but I think the correct answer is B) jammers. Gotta love those signal-jamming devices!
upvoted 0 times
Shalon
12 days ago
I always get frustrated when my Wi-Fi signal suddenly drops because of interference.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
18 days ago
Yeah, jammers can be a real nuisance when it comes to wireless communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desmond
22 days ago
I think you're right, B) jammers can definitely interfere with Wi-Fi signals.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alesia
2 months ago
I'm not sure about this one. I was thinking it might be D) printers, since they can sometimes cause interference with Wi-Fi networks. But I guess jammers make more sense since they're specifically designed to disrupt wireless signals.
upvoted 0 times
Noel
1 months ago
Jammers are designed to disrupt wireless signals.
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
1 months ago
Printers can cause interference too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
1 months ago
I believe jammers are the non-Wi-Fi interferers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Minna
1 months ago
I think it might be D) printers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elvera
2 months ago
The question is pretty straightforward. I think the answer is B) jammers. Metageek Chanalyzer is designed to identify non-Wi-Fi interference sources, and jammers are a common culprit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ora
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it could also be C) smartphones because they can interfere with Wi-Fi signals.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tommy
3 months ago
I agree with Cherelle, jammers can be identified by Metageek Chanalyzer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
3 months ago
I think the answer is B) jammers.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77