Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-425 Topic 3 Question 94 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-425 exam
Question #: 94
Topic #: 3
[All 300-425 Questions]

An engineer is performing an AP-on-a-stick survey and nds that the 5 GHz channel overlap is too high when an appropriate number of APs are used for the density requirements. Which two actions during the survey reduce channel overlap? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Gregoria
1 months ago
If I had a nickel for every time I had to deal with channel overlap, I'd be able to buy my own private island. D and C are the way to go, no doubt.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
1 months ago
Raise the minimum data rate to 24 Mbps? What is this, the stone age? D and C all the way, baby!
upvoted 0 times
Ivette
13 days ago
Definitely, UNII-2e channels will help reduce overlap.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christene
15 days ago
Yeah, directional antennas are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestine
21 days ago
C) Allow the use of UNII-2e channels.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
27 days ago
D) Use directional antennas to limit the coverage area of some APs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jutta
2 months ago
I bet the guy who came up with 'AP-on-a-stick' was having a really good day. Anyway, D and C are the way to go. Gotta keep that channel overlap down!
upvoted 0 times
Pearline
14 days ago
Yeah, those are definitely the best options to reduce channel overlap.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twila
17 days ago
C) Allow the use of UNII-2e channels.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
1 months ago
D) Use directional antennas to limit the coverage area of some APs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Boris
2 months ago
You know, using power-saving mode (E) could actually make the problem worse. Who wants their APs to be sleeping when they're trying to survey the place? D and C are definitely the right choices here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
2 months ago
Increasing the transmit power might work, but that could also create more interference. I'd go with D and C to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
Latanya
2 months ago
Raising the minimum data rate could also help reduce channel overlap by limiting the number of devices connected at lower rates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renea
2 months ago
I think allowing the use of UNII-2e channels is a good idea to spread out the APs and reduce interference.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
2 months ago
I agree, using directional antennas can help limit the coverage area and reduce channel overlap.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kiley
3 months ago
I believe raising the minimum data rate to 24 Mbps can also be effective in reducing channel overlap.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
3 months ago
I agree with Willodean. Directional antennas limit coverage area and can improve the situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecilia
3 months ago
Hmm, this seems tricky. I think D and C are the way to go. Directional antennas can really help control the coverage area, and using the UNII-2e channels could give us more options to work with.
upvoted 0 times
Mammie
1 months ago
Increasing AP transmit power to improve the SNR might be another option to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Simona
1 months ago
Raising the minimum data rate to 24 Mbps could also help in reducing channel overlap.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
1 months ago
I think allowing the use of UNII-2e channels is a good idea too, it can provide more channel options to reduce overlap.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heidy
2 months ago
I agree, using directional antennas can definitely help limit the coverage area of some APs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Willodean
3 months ago
I think using directional antennas can help reduce channel overlap.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77