Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-425 Topic 3 Question 86 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-425 exam
Question #: 86
Topic #: 3
[All 300-425 Questions]

An engineer is designing a wireless network to support Cisco Hyperlocation. The customer indicated some How is the design adjusted?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Marjory
2 months ago
Nah, A is the way to do it. Putting APs in all the corners will give you complete coverage. Simple and effective!
upvoted 0 times
Lashaun
1 days ago
But C could also work, placing an additional AP in the dense area.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulina
2 days ago
I think B is better, more APs means better coverage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elin
1 months ago
User 3: Agreed, simple and effective solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
1 months ago
User 2: That's a good idea, it will give us complete coverage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ceola
1 months ago
User 1: I think we should add additional APs to all the corners of the site.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
William
2 months ago
Haha, D is clearly the answer! Running the site survey with a -57dBm threshold? That's just asking for trouble!
upvoted 0 times
...
An
2 months ago
I disagree, I think B is the better option. Spreading more APs across the site will give better overall coverage.
upvoted 0 times
Brendan
27 days ago
User 2: I disagree, I think spreading more APs across the site will give better overall coverage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mi
27 days ago
User 4: Adding an additional AP in the middle of the dense area could also help improve coverage in that specific area.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hermila
30 days ago
User 1: I think we should add additional APs to all the corners of the site.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tandra
1 months ago
User 3: I agree with Wilburn, spreading more APs across all areas seems like the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilburn
1 months ago
User 2: But wouldn't adding additional APs to all the corners of the site provide more consistent coverage?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynna
2 months ago
User 1: I think we should go with option B, spreading more APs across the site will give better coverage.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Earleen
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe adding an additional AP in the middle of the dense area would be more effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
2 months ago
I agree with Polly, spreading the APs across all areas will ensure better coverage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavera
2 months ago
Hmm, I think C is the way to go. Adding an extra AP in the middle of the dense area should help improve coverage and capacity.
upvoted 0 times
Elenora
22 days ago
Running the site survey with -57 dBm as a threshold could also help fine-tune the network performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorathy
1 months ago
I think spreading more APs across all areas might be the way to go for a more balanced design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronald
1 months ago
But wouldn't adding more APs in all corners of the site provide better coverage?
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
2 months ago
I agree, C seems like the best option to optimize the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Polly
3 months ago
I think we should add more APs than indicated from the site survey.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77