Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-425 Topic 3 Question 72 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-425 exam
Question #: 72
Topic #: 3
[All 300-425 Questions]

An engineer working for an enterprise deployed multiple Cisco WLCs. A controller that sits in the R&D division is connected through a firewall and is part of the same mobility group. The engineer must ensure that the mobility tunneling is available through the firewall and test it as R&D engineers roam the production ..within their department. How is this requirement met?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Jolene
1 months ago
Mapping on UDP port 16666? Sounds like a secret agent mission, not a networking exam. I'll stick with the straightforward answer.
upvoted 0 times
Zona
12 days ago
Let's go with that option then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenora
28 days ago
Yeah, that sounds like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ariel
1 months ago
I think the answer is A) mapping on UDP port 16666 and mapping on Protocol 96 between management ports.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Theola
2 months ago
Protocol 96? That's like trying to send a fax over a tin can and string. I'm going with the more modern option.
upvoted 0 times
Lucina
1 months ago
Let's go with option B for the mapping on UDP port 16666 and Protocol 97.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
1 months ago
Yeah, I think mapping on UDP port 16666 and Protocol 97 is the more modern choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenny
1 months ago
I agree, Protocol 96 does seem outdated. I think option B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elke
2 months ago
C'mon, 16667? That's the number of the beast, and I don't want any demonic interference in my mobility tunneling!
upvoted 0 times
Loren
16 days ago
Carlton: Hmm, maybe I should reconsider my choice then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlton
17 days ago
User 3: I agree with Tegan, option A seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
22 days ago
User 2: Really? I'm leaning towards option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
27 days ago
User 1: I think option A is the correct one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlee
29 days ago
Thad: Hmm, I see your point. Maybe we should reconsider our choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charisse
1 months ago
User 3: I agree with Charisse, 16667 seems like a strange number to use for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thad
2 months ago
User 2: No way, that's not right. It should be mapping on UDP port 16667 and mapping on Protocol 97 between management ports.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jovita
2 months ago
User 1: I think the correct option is mapping on UDP port 16666 and mapping on Protocol 97 between management ports.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tom
2 months ago
Hmm, I see your point. Let's discuss the rationale behind each option to figure out the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
2 months ago
Hmm, let's see. Option A seems a bit outdated, like using a rotary phone to call your roommate in the next room.
upvoted 0 times
Pearlene
1 months ago
User 2: Yeah, it does seem a bit outdated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
1 months ago
User 1: I think Option A is not the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kenny
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) mapping on UDP port 16667 and mapping on Protocol 97 between management ports.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tom
2 months ago
I think the answer is A) mapping on UDP port 16666 and mapping on Protocol 96 between management ports.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jodi
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option B) mapping on UDP port 16666 and mapping on Protocol 97 between management ports could also work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleshia
2 months ago
I agree with Catalina, because UDP port 16666 is used for mobility tunneling and Protocol 96 is used for communication between controllers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
3 months ago
I think the correct answer is A) mapping on UDP port 16666 and mapping on Protocol 96 between management ports.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77