Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 0d 9h 23m 42s Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-425 Topic 10 Question 111 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-425 exam
Question #: 111
Topic #: 10
[All 300-425 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit. During a post Mesh deployment survey, an engineer notices that frame collisions occur when MAP-1 and MAP-3 talk to RAP-2 Which type of issue does the engineer need to address in the design?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

https://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/solutions/Enterprise/Mobility/emob30dg/WiMesh.pdf


Contribute your Thoughts:

Lino
8 days ago
I think it's backhaul latency, as that could also lead to frame collisions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nida
10 days ago
I believe it could also be hidden node causing the collisions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hillary
24 days ago
I agree with Ollie, it makes sense given the scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maybelle
28 days ago
I'm not sure, but I think backhaul latency could also be a factor here. If the connection between the MAPs and RAP-2 is slow, that could contribute to the frame collisions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doretha
30 days ago
This sounds like a classic hidden node problem. The frames colliding between MAP-1 and MAP-3 when talking to RAP-2 suggests they can't hear each other, which is the definition of a hidden node issue.
upvoted 0 times
Melita
7 days ago
B) backhaul latency
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
10 days ago
A) co-channel interference
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ollie
1 months ago
I think the issue is co-channel interference.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77
a