Cisco Exam 300-425 Topic 10 Question 80 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-425 exam

Question #: 80
Topic #: 10

Clustering Cisco WLCs into a single RF group enables the RRM algorithms to scale beyond the capabilities of a single Cisco WLC. How many WLC and APs in an RF group can the controller software scale up to in WLC release 8.9 depending on the platform?

Aup to 20 WLCs and 1000 APs

Bup to 20 WLCs and 3000 APs

Cup to 20 WLCs and 4000 APs

Dup to 20 WLCs and 6000 APs

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Helene at Dec 24, 2023, 05:34 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-425 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Madelyn

13 days ago

I'm not sure, but I think it makes sense that clustering WLCs would allow for more APs to be managed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marisha

17 days ago

I'd love to see the power bill for a setup like that. Maybe they have a secret nuclear reactor powering it all.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alana

19 days ago

I agree with Stefany, because the RRM algorithms need to be able to scale efficiently.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stefany

20 days ago

I think the answer is A) up to 20 WLCs and 1000 APs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lillian

20 days ago

Hmm, 20 WLCs and 3000 APs sounds pretty impressive. I wonder if they can all communicate in perfect harmony.

upvoted 0 times

Antione

3 days ago

B) up to 20 WLCs and 3000 APs

upvoted 0 times

...

Francesco

4 days ago

A) up to 20 WLCs and 1000 APs

upvoted 0 times

...

Mariko

23 days ago

Whoa, 6000 APs in a single RF group? That's gotta be one massive wireless network!

upvoted 0 times

...

Eric

26 days ago

I'm not sure, but I think it makes sense to have a limit on the number of WLCs and APs in an RF group for better performance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Desmond

29 days ago

I agree with Jeannetta, because the RRM algorithms need to scale efficiently.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jeannetta

1 months ago

I think the answer is A) up to 20 WLCs and 1000 APs.

upvoted 0 times

...