Cisco Exam 300-425 Topic 1 Question 84 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-425 exam

Question #: 84
Topic #: 1

Refer to the exhibit.

An enterprise has offices spread around the globe. The APs are connected to different controllers installed in separate datacenters. The IT team wants to allow clients to roam from controllers in group ABC to controllers in group XYZ. Which feature must be incorporated in the design to accomplish this task?

Aswitch peer group

Bworkgroup bridge

CmDNS gateway

Dmobility lists

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Johnna at Mar 17, 2024, 04:47 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-425 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Tamera

11 months ago

I'm not sure, but isn't workgroup bridge also a possibility for this scenario?

upvoted 0 times

...

Merilyn

11 months ago

I disagree, I believe it's switch peer group that allows for roaming between controllers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gilma

11 months ago

I think the feature needed for clients to roam between controllers is mobility lists.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chau

11 months ago

I think C) mDNS gateway might be the correct answer, as it helps with device discovery across subnets.

upvoted 0 times

...

Loren

12 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think B) workgroup bridge could also be a valid option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Goldie

1 years ago

I disagree, I believe it is D) mobility lists.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorothy

1 years ago

I think the answer is A) switch peer group.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alverta

1 years ago

Haha, good one! It's like having a roaming SIM card for your wireless clients. Just make sure they don't rack up any international roaming charges!

upvoted 0 times

Elbert

1 years ago

Interesting, let's weigh the pros and cons of each option before making a decision.

upvoted 0 times

...

Argelia

1 years ago

B) workgroup bridge could also be a potential solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Peggy

1 years ago

I agree, let's see if anyone else has a different perspective.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ashton

1 years ago

Well, both options could work, but let's see what others think.

upvoted 0 times

...

Armando

1 years ago

Really? I was leaning towards C) mDNS gateway.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wilda

1 years ago

Hmm, I think it might be better to go with D) mobility lists.

upvoted 0 times

...

Evangelina

1 years ago

A) switch peer group

upvoted 0 times

...

Alfreda

1 years ago

Aha, I think 'mobility lists' is the right answer here. This feature allows the controllers to share client information and session state, enabling clients to seamlessly roam between controller groups. Smart!

upvoted 0 times

...

Gayla

1 years ago

Yeah, mobility lists makes perfect sense. It's like having a universal translator for your clients as they move around the globe - no more getting lost in translation!

upvoted 0 times

...