Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-420 Topic 8 Question 109 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-420 exam
Question #: 109
Topic #: 8
[All 300-420 Questions]

An architect is designing a network solution for a customer The network is IPv6-only with 1000 hosts. The design must provide external access to up to 10 concurrent IPv6 hosts to allow communication with legacy IPv4 devices on an adjacent network. The customer set aside 10 IPv4 addresses to allow for one-to-one communication between hosts. Which solution must the architect select?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Genevive
13 days ago
You know, if I were the architect, I'd be tempted to suggest a carrier-grade NAT solution just to see the customer's reaction. But that's probably not the best idea for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rutha
16 days ago
I see your point, Rex, but I still think stateful NAT64 is the most suitable option for this specific requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shala
21 days ago
Ha! I bet the architect is wishing they had a crystal ball to see the future network needs. Better play it safe and go with the classic stateful NAT64.
upvoted 0 times
Juliana
6 days ago
A) stateful NAT64
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mickie
24 days ago
I don't know, guys. Dynamic NAT-PT could give the customer more flexibility if they need to expand the network in the future. But I'm not sure if it's the best fit for this specific requirement.
upvoted 0 times
Marci
19 days ago
A) stateful NAT64 could be a good option for providing external access to IPv4 hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rex
27 days ago
I believe dynamic NPTv6 could also work, as it allows for prefix translation without changing the addresses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jill
28 days ago
I agree with Magnolia, stateful NAT64 seems like the best solution for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magnolia
30 days ago
I think the architect should select stateful NAT64.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
1 months ago
Dynamic NPTv6 could work too, but it might be overkill for this scenario. The customer wants a simple one-to-one mapping, so static NAT-PT might be the most efficient choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hermila
1 months ago
Hmm, I think option A is the way to go. Stateful NAT64 seems like the most straightforward solution to connect the IPv6 hosts with the legacy IPv4 devices.
upvoted 0 times
Audra
8 days ago
Yes, stateful NAT64 will ensure smooth communication between the two networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
15 days ago
I agree, it provides a seamless way to connect the IPv6 hosts with the legacy IPv4 devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
27 days ago
A) stateful NAT64 is definitely the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77