Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-420 Topic 7 Question 66 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-420 exam
Question #: 66
Topic #: 7
[All 300-420 Questions]

A customer with an IPv4 only network topology wants to enable IPv6 connectivity while preserving the IPv4 topology services. The customer plans to migrate IPv4 services to the IPv6 topology, then decommission the IPv4 topology. Which topology supports these requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Reita
1 months ago
I hear the customer is also considering using a carrier pigeon-based network for their IPv6 implementation. It's the latest and greatest in avian-powered internet technology!
upvoted 0 times
Timothy
3 days ago
B: I agree, dual stack allows for both IPv4 and IPv6 to coexist.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derick
7 days ago
A: The best option for that scenario would be dual stack.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hui
1 months ago
NAT64 is a clever idea, but it could potentially introduce some performance and compatibility issues, especially during the transition phase.
upvoted 0 times
Davida
21 days ago
A: I think the best option for that scenario would be dual stack.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Penney
2 months ago
6to4 could work, but it might introduce additional complexity and overhead that the customer may not want to deal with.
upvoted 0 times
Rene
3 days ago
D: NAT64 could also be a good choice to facilitate communication between IPv4 and IPv6 networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andra
4 days ago
C: 6to4 could work, but it might introduce additional complexity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gene
7 days ago
B: Yeah, dual stack allows for both IPv4 and IPv6 to coexist.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herschel
9 days ago
A: I think the best option for that scenario would be dual stack.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annabelle
10 days ago
D: NAT64 could also be a good choice to facilitate communication between IPv4 and IPv6 networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomas
12 days ago
C: 6to4 could work, but it might introduce additional complexity and overhead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
13 days ago
B: Agreed, dual stack allows for both IPv4 and IPv6 to coexist.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paul
20 days ago
A: I think dual stack would be the best option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Quentin
2 months ago
6VPE is an interesting option, but I'm not sure if it fully meets the requirements of preserving the existing IPv4 topology services.
upvoted 0 times
Rebbecca
29 days ago
Vanna: Exactly, it would help preserve the existing IPv4 services while enabling IPv6 connectivity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanna
1 months ago
User 2: That could work, it allows for both IPv4 and IPv6 to coexist.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyla
2 months ago
User 1: Have you considered using dual stack?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bok
2 months ago
The dual stack topology seems like the perfect solution here. It allows the network to support both IPv4 and IPv6 concurrently during the migration process.
upvoted 0 times
Mari
19 days ago
Ernie: 6VPE and NAT64 are more specific solutions, but dual stack is more versatile for this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantay
20 days ago
User 3: What about 6VPE or NAT64?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
21 days ago
User 2: Agreed, it allows for both IPv4 and IPv6 to coexist during the migration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
1 months ago
User 1: I think the dual stack topology is the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jean
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think NAT64 could also work for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caitlin
3 months ago
I agree with Erasmo, dual stack allows for both IPv4 and IPv6 connectivity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
3 months ago
I think the answer is A) dual stack.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77