Cisco Exam 300-420 Topic 2 Question 86 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-420 exam

Question #: 86
Topic #: 2

An engineer working for a service provider with an employee ID: 4863:43:939 must design a solution to provide remote connectivity over the public internet. The design must:

securely connect multiple remote sites to the central site

provide redundant paths to the central site

allow auto path selection based on failure and connection quality

support IP multicast

minimal configuration at remote sites

Which solution must the engineer choose?

AMPLS provided service with BGP

Bdual DMVPN with EIGRP routing

Cfull mesh OSPF with IPsec tunnels

Dfull mesh ISIS with GRE tunnels and IPsec

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Eden at Apr 23, 2024, 07:50 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-420 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Aleisha

1 months ago

Hmm, I wonder if they accept carrier pigeons as a remote connectivity solution. That would be really low-configuration at the remote sites!

upvoted 0 times

Viva

5 days ago

B) dual DMVPN with EIGRP routing

upvoted 0 times

...

Aleshia

12 days ago

A) MPLS provided service with BGP

upvoted 0 times

...

Carmela

2 months ago

ISIS? What is this, the 90s? GRE tunnels and IPsec seem like a lot of overhead. I'd keep it simple with DMVPN.

upvoted 0 times

Malcolm

28 days ago

ISIS? What is this, the 90s? GRE tunnels and IPsec seem like a lot of overhead. I'd keep it simple with DMVPN.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ellsworth

1 months ago

C) full mesh OSPF with IPsec tunnels

upvoted 0 times

...

Leota

2 months ago

B) dual DMVPN with EIGRP routing

upvoted 0 times

...

Val

2 months ago

A) MPLS provided service with BGP

upvoted 0 times

...

Anjelica

2 months ago

Full mesh OSPF with IPsec tunnels? Sounds like a lot of manual configuration at the remote sites. I'd go for something more plug-and-play.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rolland

2 months ago

MPLS? Really? That's overkill for this requirement. We need something more straightforward and cost-effective.

upvoted 0 times

Lilli

1 months ago

MPLS is too complex and expensive for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Levi

1 months ago

B) dual DMVPN with EIGRP routing

upvoted 0 times

...

Tracey

1 months ago

D) full mesh ISIS with GRE tunnels and IPsec

upvoted 0 times

...

Vicente

1 months ago

C) full mesh OSPF with IPsec tunnels

upvoted 0 times

...

Angelica

1 months ago

B) dual DMVPN with EIGRP routing

upvoted 0 times

...

Ettie

1 months ago

A) MPLS provided service with BGP

upvoted 0 times

...

Tiffiny

2 months ago

Dual DMVPN with EIGRP routing seems like the way to go. It provides redundant paths and auto path selection - perfect for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Audria

2 months ago

I disagree. I believe option C) full mesh OSPF with IPsec tunnels would be a better choice for supporting IP multicast.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rolande

2 months ago

I agree with Janessa. DMVPN provides secure connectivity and EIGRP allows for redundant paths.

upvoted 0 times

...

Janessa

3 months ago

I think the engineer should choose option B) dual DMVPN with EIGRP routing.

upvoted 0 times

...