Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-420 Topic 10 Question 111 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-420 exam
Question #: 111
Topic #: 10
[All 300-420 Questions]

An engineer is designing a PIM Anycast RP solution between two data centers. The design must ensure that RP1 in DC1 and RP2 in DC2 inform each other about specific sources that have joined locally. Which solution must the engineer choose?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

In Anycast RP, two or more RPs are configured with the same IP address on loopback interfaces. The Anycast RP loopback address should be configured with a 32-bit mask, making it a host address. All the downstream routers should be configured to 'know' that the Anycast RP loopback address is the IP address of their local RP. IP routing automatically will select the topologically closest RP for each source and receiver.

MSDP used for Anycast RP is an intradomain feature that provides redundancy and load-sharing capabilities. Enterprise customers typically use Anycast RP for configuring a Protocol Independent Multicast sparse mode (PIM-SM) network to meet fault tolerance requirements within a single multicast domain.

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios/solutions_docs/ip_multicast/White_papers/anycast.html#wp1029118

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/ip-multicast/115011-anycast-pim.html

' You need to have a loopback on each prospective RP router, which is different than the loopback that is being used as the RP address.'


Contribute your Thoughts:

Willis
9 days ago
Wait, are we sure we can't just extend the subnet and let the RP registers figure it out? Option A sounds like the lazy but effective solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
12 days ago
I'm not sure, but I think D could also be a valid option since PIM registers from the source will reach each RP by default.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casey
13 days ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C, enabling MSDP between RPs using the configured Anycast RP address.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jackie
24 days ago
I'm leaning towards C. Using the Anycast RP address for MSDP just seems more straightforward, doesn't it?
upvoted 0 times
Tammi
5 days ago
C) Enable MSDP between RPs using the configured Anycast RP address
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
8 days ago
B) Enable MSDP between RPs using separate unique loopback interfaces
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamie
12 days ago
A) Provision the RPs on the same IP subnet and extend the subnet at Layer 2 between data centers
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jettie
1 months ago
I think the answer is B, enabling MSDP between RPs using separate unique loopback interfaces.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
1 months ago
Option B seems like the way to go. MSDP between RPs using separate loopback interfaces sounds like the most reliable approach.
upvoted 0 times
Gail
4 days ago
User 3: It seems like a solid solution to make sure the RPs in both data centers can inform each other about specific sources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelaide
5 days ago
User 2: I agree, having separate loopback interfaces can help ensure better communication between the RPs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
8 days ago
User 1: I think option B is the best choice. Using separate loopback interfaces for MSDP between RPs sounds reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77