Cisco Exam 300-410 Topic 13 Question 72 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-410 exam

Question #: 72
Topic #: 13

[All 300-410 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit Which action fixes the OSPF routes redistribution into EIGRP?

AMatch external type to type-1

BSet tags before matching into EIGRP

CSet a default metric in the route map

DMatch OSPF and EIGR IDs

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Devora at Jul 03, 2023, 01:21 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-410 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Yesenia

2 months ago

Hmm, Option A sounds like it's trying to match apples to oranges. I bet the network admin who set this up is already pulling their hair out!

upvoted 0 times

Jeannine

23 days ago

User 3: Matching OSPF and EIGR IDs could also solve the issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Junita

1 months ago

User 2: I think setting a default metric in the route map might be the best solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Louis

1 months ago

User 1: Option A does seem a bit off, but it might work in this case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashawnda

2 months ago

Hold on, I thought OSPF and EIGRP were like oil and water, mixing them up is just asking for trouble! Option D seems like a recipe for disaster.

upvoted 0 times

Detra

2 days ago

User 4: Matching external type to type-1 might be a better solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mindy

6 days ago

User 3: Setting tags before matching into EIGRP seems like a safer option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maddie

7 days ago

User 2: Yeah, it could cause some serious issues with routing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cherelle

9 days ago

User 1: I agree, mixing OSPF and EIGRP IDs sounds risky.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dean

19 days ago

Matching OSPF and EIGR IDs might be the safest option.

upvoted 0 times

...

An

1 months ago

I think setting a default metric in the route map could work too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brittni

1 months ago

But what about setting tags before matching into EIGRP?

upvoted 0 times

...

Alton

2 months ago

Option A) Match external type to type-1

upvoted 0 times

...

Viki

2 months ago

I'm leaning towards Option B, setting tags before matching into EIGRP could help distinguish the OSPF routes and ensure proper redistribution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Teri

2 months ago

Hmm, that makes sense too. Let's discuss further to figure out the right answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Art

2 months ago

I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) Set a default metric in the route map.

upvoted 0 times

...

Louis

2 months ago

Option C looks promising, setting a default metric in the route map seems like a logical approach to fix the OSPF routes redistribution issue.

upvoted 0 times

Margurite

28 days ago

D) Match OSPF and EIGR IDs

upvoted 0 times

...

Sheron

1 months ago

C) Set a default metric in the route map

upvoted 0 times

...

Whitney

1 months ago

B) Set tags before matching into EIGRP

upvoted 0 times

...

Curtis

2 months ago

A) Match external type to type-1

upvoted 0 times

...

Lamonica

2 months ago

User 2: Yeah, setting a default metric in the route map makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Billye

2 months ago

User 1: I think option C is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Teri

3 months ago

I think the answer is A) Match external type to type-1.

upvoted 0 times

...

Larue

3 months ago

But setting a default metric in the route map makes more sense because it directly impacts the redistribution process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Denny

3 months ago

I disagree, I believe the answer is A) Match external type to type-1.

upvoted 0 times

...

Larue

3 months ago

I think the correct answer is C) Set a default metric in the route map.

upvoted 0 times

...