Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco Exam 300-410 Topic 10 Question 89 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-410 exam
Question #: 89
Topic #: 10
[All 300-410 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

R1 is being monitored using SNMP and monitoring devices are getting only partial information. What action should be taken to resolve this issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

IP SLA (Internet Protocol Service Level Agreement) is a feature that allows you to measure network performance such as latency, jitter, packet loss, and so on.In this case, it's being used to monitor the reachability of a next hop on a router123.

When the next hop is unreachable, the router is executing tracking and failing over to another route. However, packet loss is experienced because the reachability is flapping. This could be due to the router switching back and forth between the primary and backup routes too quickly.

To resolve this issue, you can introduce a delay in the tracking process. This can be done by appending a delay to the track command.Option C suggests appending a delay of 50 seconds for the up state and 60 seconds for the down state45. This means that the router will wait for 50 seconds before declaring the tracked object as up (reachable) and 60 seconds before declaring it as down (unreachable).This delay can help prevent the router from switching routes too quickly, thus reducing the chances of reachability flapping and packet loss45.


Configure ISP Failover with Default Routes Using IP SLA Tracking - Cisco

Using IPSLA to change routing - Cisco Community

How to Use IP SLA Technology to Assess WAN Performance

Reliable Static Routing with IP SLA - NetworkLessons.com

Configuring Static Route Tracking using IP SLA (Basic)

by Buck at May 23, 2024, 02:45 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-410 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Yvonne
1 months ago
Honestly, I'd just unplug the whole thing and see if it comes back to life. That's the IT way, right?
upvoted 0 times
Hyun
8 days ago
User 3: I think modifying the CoPP policy to increase the configured CIR limit for SNMP might also work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jules
16 days ago
User 2: Yeah, that could help. Or maybe modify the access list to include snmptrap?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nell
19 days ago
User 1: Maybe try modifying the CoPP policy to increase the configured exceeded limit for SNMP?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Isaiah
1 months ago
Ahh, the classic SNMP conundrum. I say we just throw a few more routers at it and see what happens. Worked for me last time!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamesha
2 months ago
The access list needs some love, too. Adding a line to allow UDP any any eq SNMP should do the trick. Gotta love those network protocols, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Deandrea
25 days ago
User 3: Network protocols can be tricky, but once you get them right, it's smooth sailing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Asha
26 days ago
User 2: Yeah, that should definitely help with getting the full information from SNMP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tashia
1 months ago
User 1: I think we should modify the access list to add a second line to allow udp any any eq snmp.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Douglass
2 months ago
C) is the way to go. Increase the CIR limit for SNMP and you should be good to go. Simple as that!
upvoted 0 times
Ranee
20 days ago
C) Modify the CoPP policy to increase the configured CIR limit for SNMP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalind
27 days ago
B) Modify the access list to include snmptrap.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregoria
2 months ago
A) Modify the CoPP policy to increase the configured exceeded limit for SNMP.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Karrie
2 months ago
Ah, I see. Modifying the access list to include SNMP trap might be the way to go. Gotta love those traps!
upvoted 0 times
Dorinda
26 days ago
User 4: Or adding a second line to allow udp any any eq snmp in the access list.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
1 months ago
User 3: Maybe modifying the CoPP policy to increase the configured CIR limit for SNMP could also work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
2 months ago
User 2: Yeah, that could help in getting the complete information from R1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
2 months ago
User 1: I think modifying the access list to include snmptrap is the solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carlota
2 months ago
Hmm, the CoPP policy seems to be the culprit here. Increasing the SNMP limit should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
Alba
1 months ago
D) Modify the access list to add a second line to allow udp any any eq snmp
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanne
1 months ago
C) Modify the CoPP policy to increase the configured CIR limit for SNMP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenita
1 months ago
C) Modify the CoPP policy to increase the configured CIR limit for SNMP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rex
1 months ago
A) Modify the CoPP policy to increase the configured exceeded limit for SNMP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
1 months ago
B) Modify the access list to include snmptrap.
upvoted 0 times
...
Therese
2 months ago
A) Modify the CoPP policy to increase the configured exceeded limit for SNMP.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stevie
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option D) Modify the access list to add a second line to allow udp any any eq snmp could also be a valid solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheldon
2 months ago
I agree with Alyce, increasing the limit for SNMP in the CoPP policy should resolve the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
3 months ago
I think the answer is A) Modify the CoPP policy to increase the configured exceeded limit for SNMP.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77