Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco Exam 300-410 Topic 10 Question 89 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-410 exam
Question #: 89
Topic #: 10
[All 300-410 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

R1 is being monitored using SNMP and monitoring devices are getting only partial information. What action should be taken to resolve this issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

IP SLA (Internet Protocol Service Level Agreement) is a feature that allows you to measure network performance such as latency, jitter, packet loss, and so on.In this case, it's being used to monitor the reachability of a next hop on a router123.

When the next hop is unreachable, the router is executing tracking and failing over to another route. However, packet loss is experienced because the reachability is flapping. This could be due to the router switching back and forth between the primary and backup routes too quickly.

To resolve this issue, you can introduce a delay in the tracking process. This can be done by appending a delay to the track command.Option C suggests appending a delay of 50 seconds for the up state and 60 seconds for the down state45. This means that the router will wait for 50 seconds before declaring the tracked object as up (reachable) and 60 seconds before declaring it as down (unreachable).This delay can help prevent the router from switching routes too quickly, thus reducing the chances of reachability flapping and packet loss45.


Configure ISP Failover with Default Routes Using IP SLA Tracking - Cisco

Using IPSLA to change routing - Cisco Community

How to Use IP SLA Technology to Assess WAN Performance

Reliable Static Routing with IP SLA - NetworkLessons.com

Configuring Static Route Tracking using IP SLA (Basic)

by Buck at May 23, 2024, 02:45 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-410 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Douglass
C) is the way to go. Increase the CIR limit for SNMP and you should be good to go. Simple as that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Karrie
10 days ago
Ah, I see. Modifying the access list to include SNMP trap might be the way to go. Gotta love those traps!
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlota
19 days ago
Hmm, the CoPP policy seems to be the culprit here. Increasing the SNMP limit should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
Therese
6 days ago
A) Modify the CoPP policy to increase the configured exceeded limit for SNMP.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stevie
21 days ago
I'm not sure, but I think option D) Modify the access list to add a second line to allow udp any any eq snmp could also be a valid solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheldon
23 days ago
I agree with Alyce, increasing the limit for SNMP in the CoPP policy should resolve the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
24 days ago
I think the answer is A) Modify the CoPP policy to increase the configured exceeded limit for SNMP.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77