Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-410 Topic 1 Question 81 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-410 exam
Question #: 81
Topic #: 1
[All 300-410 Questions]

Exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit. A network is configured for EIGRP equal-cost load balancing, but the traffic destined to the servers is not load balanced. Link metrics from router R2 to R3 and R4 are the same. Which delay value must be configured to resolve the issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Carey
2 months ago
Wait, is the answer D) 2200 on R4 E0/1? That's gotta be a joke, right? I mean, who would even think of setting a delay that high?
upvoted 0 times
Corrie
5 days ago
C) 120 on R3 E0/1
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
6 days ago
B) 120 on R4 E0/1
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacinta
1 months ago
A) 208 on R3 E0/0
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Darrel
2 months ago
The correct answer is C) 120 on R3 E0/1. Increasing the delay on the R3 interface will make the path to R3 equal in cost to the path to R4, ensuring proper load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
Mauricio
1 months ago
Thanks for the clarification. I'll remember that for next time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Art
2 months ago
Yes, the correct answer is C) 120 on R3 E0/1. That will balance the traffic properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dortha
2 months ago
I think the delay value on R3 E0/1 needs to be configured to resolve the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Desire
2 months ago
Haha, I bet the answer is D) 2200 on R4 E0/1. That's just way too high of a delay, but it would definitely balance the traffic!
upvoted 0 times
Cristal
1 days ago
No way, it's actually A) 208 on R3 E0/0. That's the delay value that needs to be configured to resolve the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vi
8 days ago
Haha, I bet the answer is D) 2200 on R4 E0/1. That's just way too high of a delay, but it would definitely balance the traffic!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Reuben
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option A) 208 on R3 E0/0 could also be a valid solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosamond
2 months ago
I agree with Jerry, the delay value of 120 on R4 E0/1 seems like the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hollis
2 months ago
I think the answer is B) 120 on R4 E0/1. Configuring the delay on the R4 interface seems more logical to me.
upvoted 0 times
India
28 days ago
Yes, that should help with load balancing the traffic to the servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tarra
1 months ago
I agree, setting the delay on R4 E0/1 makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
1 months ago
Yes, that seems like the correct solution to balance the traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawna
1 months ago
I agree, setting the delay on R4 E0/1 makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jerry
2 months ago
I think the delay value of 120 on R4 E0/1 should be configured.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corazon
2 months ago
Hmm, that's interesting. Can you explain your rationale for choosing 208 on R3 E0/0?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hobert
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the delay value should be 208 on R3 E0/0.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherri
2 months ago
The answer is C) 120 on R3 E0/1. The delay value needs to be configured on the link between R2 and R3 to ensure equal-cost load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
Roosevelt
2 months ago
Got it, thanks for clarifying!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
2 months ago
No, the correct answer is C) 120 on R3 E0/1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
2 months ago
But what about R4 E0/1? Could it be 120 as well?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashanda
2 months ago
I think the delay value should be configured on R3 E0/1.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Corazon
3 months ago
I think the delay value should be 120 on R4 E0/1.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77