Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco Exam 200-201 Topic 3 Question 105 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 200-201 exam
Question #: 105
Topic #: 3
[All 200-201 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Which alert is identified from this packet capture?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The screenshot shows multiple POP requests with the commandPASS, which is typically used for password entry. The rapid succession and variation of these requests suggest an attempt to guess the password, characteristic of a brute-force attack. Remember, always verify with additional data or context when possible, as packet captures can contain vast amounts of information and may require thorough analysis for accurate interpretation.


by Rodney at Feb 11, 2025, 05:42 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 200-201 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Stanford
2 months ago
This is easy, it's ARP poisoning all the way. Nasty stuff, but I'll take it over a SQL injection any day. At least I can understand ARP!
upvoted 0 times
Herminia
1 months ago
User 4: SQL injection is a whole different level of threat.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francoise
1 months ago
User 3: ARP poisoning is a common tactic used by hackers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
1 months ago
User 2: Yeah, ARP attacks can be pretty sneaky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theola
2 months ago
User 1: I agree, ARP poisoning is definitely the alert in this packet capture.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alfreda
2 months ago
Haha, brute-force attack? Really? This is way too sophisticated for that. I'd say SQL injection is the most likely culprit.
upvoted 0 times
Brett
2 months ago
User 2: Yeah, brute-force attack seems too basic for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
2 months ago
User 1: I agree, SQL injection seems more likely.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Raylene
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but the packet capture looks like it could be a man-in-the-middle attack. Those are always nasty to deal with.
upvoted 0 times
Mozell
2 months ago
User 2: No, I believe it's a brute-force attack.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evan
2 months ago
User 1: I think it might be an ARP poisoning.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nu
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it could also be a man-in-the-middle attack.
upvoted 0 times
...
Omer
3 months ago
I agree with Kenneth, the packet capture looks like ARP poisoning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
3 months ago
I think the alert is ARP poisoning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
3 months ago
This is clearly an ARP poisoning attack. The packet capture shows suspicious ARP traffic, which is a classic signature.
upvoted 0 times
Malcolm
2 months ago
We need to strengthen our network security to prevent future incidents.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audry
2 months ago
Do we have any security measures in place to detect and mitigate such attacks?
upvoted 0 times
...
Elly
2 months ago
We should take immediate action to prevent further damage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shasta
2 months ago
I agree, the ARP poisoning attack is evident from the packet capture.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77