Okay, let me get this straight. Untampered images are good for evidence, but tampered images are for security investigations. And here I was thinking they were all just digital boo-boos.
Ah, the old hash conundrum. If the stored hash matches the computed one, it's untampered. But if they're identical, it's tampered? This question is a mind-bender!
Wait, so tampered images can be used in security investigations, but untampered images can be used as evidence? I think I need to re-read this a few times to make sure I've got it straight.
Vallie
2 months agoYuki
23 days agoTaryn
29 days agoLai
1 months agoBethanie
2 months agoKristel
2 months agoRikki
19 hours agoKizzy
3 days agoCaitlin
4 days agoKing
9 days agoRegenia
17 days agoBev
19 days agoOwen
1 months agoVi
2 months agoFelton
2 months agoJenise
2 months agoAlishia
2 months agoIluminada
2 months agoAlayna
2 months agoChristiane
2 months agoRasheeda
3 months ago