I think C) is the way to go. The attack surface is where the vulnerabilities are, and the attack vector is how the attacker can leverage those weak spots.
Haha, I bet the correct answer is D. An attack vector identifies the outcome, and the attack surface is like the launch pad. Just kidding, I know that's not right.
C) An attack surface recognizes which network parts are vulnerable to an attack; and an attack vector identifies which attacks are possible with these vulnerabilities.
B) An attack vector identifies components that can be exploited, and an attack surface identifies the potential path an attack can take to penetrate the network.
A) An attack surface identifies vulnerabilities that require user input or validation; and an attack vector identifies vulnerabilities that are independent of user actions.
B) makes the most sense to me. An attack vector is the path an attacker can take to exploit a vulnerability, while the attack surface is all the potential entry points they can target.
B) makes the most sense to me. An attack vector is the path an attacker can take to exploit a vulnerability, while the attack surface is all the potential entry points they can target.
B) An attack vector identifies components that can be exploited, and an attack surface identifies the potential path an attack can take to penetrate the network.
Brock
1 months agoMarylou
1 months agoDorcas
9 days agoLorean
12 days agoShanice
24 days agoChuck
2 months agoMarge
9 days agoJesusita
12 days agoGail
16 days agoEzekiel
2 months agoTy
26 days agoGerri
30 days agoSamira
2 months agoKaran
2 months agoSamira
2 months ago