Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 010-151 Topic 2 Question 104 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 010-151 exam
Question #: 104
Topic #: 2
[All 010-151 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Which item does C represent?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Leontine
4 months ago
QSFP28 all the way! Anything less and I might as well be using a tin can and some string to connect my network.
upvoted 0 times
Jeannetta
3 months ago
I've always preferred QSFP+ for my network setups, but QSFP28 seems to be the new standard.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
3 months ago
SFP+ is good too, but QSFP28 definitely offers better performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
3 months ago
I agree, QSFP28 is the way to go for high-speed connections.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Val
4 months ago
Hmm, SFP+? I thought we were talking about a 100G module here. Did someone forget to take their coffee break today?
upvoted 0 times
Allene
3 months ago
No, SFP+ is not supported. It's QSFP28 or QSFP+ for this module.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lennie
3 months ago
C) Cisco CPAK
upvoted 0 times
...
Clemencia
4 months ago
D) QSFP+
upvoted 0 times
...
Jill
4 months ago
A) QSFP28
upvoted 0 times
...
Desmond
4 months ago
D) QSFP+
upvoted 0 times
...
Pedro
4 months ago
A) QSFP28
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Isaiah
5 months ago
I believe D) QSFP+ is not supported for 100-Gigabit Ethernet on the Cisco Nexus 7700 F4-Series.
upvoted 0 times
...
Queen
5 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) Cisco CPAK could also be a possibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosamond
5 months ago
I don't know, man. QSFP+ seems like the safe bet to me. Can't go wrong with a classic, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
5 months ago
Wait, CPAK? What is this, the year 2010? I bet Cisco's trying to make us buy their proprietary modules again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
5 months ago
I agree with Raylene, QSFP28 makes sense for 100-Gigabit Ethernet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earleen
5 months ago
QSFP28 definitely looks like the right answer here. Gotta keep up with that sweet, sweet 100Gbit bandwidth!
upvoted 0 times
Major
4 months ago
No, it's actually QSFP28 for that module.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mickie
4 months ago
D) QSFP+
upvoted 0 times
...
Gene
4 months ago
You're right, QSFP28 is the one for 100Gbit bandwidth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
4 months ago
I think QSFP+ might also be supported, but QSFP28 is the latest standard for 100Gigabit Ethernet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joaquin
4 months ago
A) QSFP28
upvoted 0 times
...
Viki
4 months ago
Are you sure? I think QSFP28 is the one supported.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deane
4 months ago
C) Cisco CPAK
upvoted 0 times
...
Hildegarde
4 months ago
D) QSFP+
upvoted 0 times
...
Geoffrey
4 months ago
Definitely, QSFP28 is the correct answer for that module.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reyes
4 months ago
A) QSFP28
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
4 months ago
Definitely, QSFP28 is the correct answer for that module.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leigha
5 months ago
A) QSFP28
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Raylene
5 months ago
I think the answer is A) QSFP28.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77