Wait, they can arrest you for not doing a specific performance? That's like something out of a bad legal thriller. I guess it's true, though - the courts can get pretty serious about enforcing those orders.
I think the key is understanding that specific performance is an equitable remedy, not a legal one. So B is definitely wrong, and D is only partially true. A and C seem to be the most accurate statements.
Haha, I can just imagine someone getting arrested for not completing a specific performance. That would be quite a spectacle! But in all seriousness, A and C seem to be the best answers here.
I'm not so sure about B. Specific performance is usually a last resort, not a 'cheap and quick' solution. And D doesn't sound right either - the innocent party has a duty to mitigate losses, but that's a separate issue.
A and C seem like the correct options here. Specific performance can be a lengthy and costly process, and a party can face legal consequences for not complying with the order.
Freeman
30 days agoUlysses
1 months agoAnnabelle
1 months agoWillow
1 months agoCordelia
10 days agoJill
14 days agoSharika
1 months agoCarla
10 days agoSarah
24 days agoAdria
1 months agoDenae
2 months agoAngelica
2 months agoLasandra
2 months agoLevi
2 months agoTamra
2 months agoTonette
2 months ago