Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CIPS Exam L4M6 Topic 4 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIPS's L4M6 exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 4
[All L4M6 Questions]

A local council requires facilities management services for ten schools based in their region. This service is a high-spend, high-risk, critical contract. Which sourcing approach would be the most appropriate?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The correct answer is 'Sudden changes in the marketplace' -- this is a reason a buyer would be reactive. Reactive is when something happens to you and it forces you to act in a certain way. The other options would be strategic rather than reactive. P. 163


by Maurine at Jan 07, 2023, 03:57 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium L4M6 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Bo
1 months ago
D) Direct negotiation? Really? That's like trying to haggle with the school principal for a better cafeteria deal. Not the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
Luis
11 days ago
A: Direct negotiation might not be the best option in this case, it could lead to conflicts and misunderstandings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aide
22 days ago
B: I agree, it would ensure transparency and fair pricing for the council.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonna
24 days ago
A: I think competitive bidding would be the best approach for this high-spend contract.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dallas
2 months ago
C) Statement of source requirements could be a good option too. Clearly defining the requirements upfront is crucial for a contract of this scale.
upvoted 0 times
Louisa
5 days ago
C) Statement of source requirements could be a good option too. Clearly defining the requirements upfront is crucial for a contract of this scale.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laine
9 days ago
B) Competitive tendering is a good option for ensuring fair competition among potential suppliers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefania
14 days ago
A) Request for quotation would be the most appropriate in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tori
2 months ago
I think direct negotiation could work too, as it allows for more flexibility in negotiations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wayne
2 months ago
I agree, B) Competitive tendering is the way to go. Gotta keep those facilities managers on their toes!
upvoted 0 times
Micheal
1 months ago
B) Competitive tendering
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
2 months ago
D) Direct negotiation
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
2 months ago
A) Request for quotation
upvoted 0 times
...
Refugia
2 months ago
C) Statement of source requirements
upvoted 0 times
...
Anglea
2 months ago
B) Competitive tendering
upvoted 0 times
...
Trina
2 months ago
A) Request for quotation
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hannah
2 months ago
B) Competitive tendering seems like the most robust approach for a high-spend, high-risk contract. It ensures fair competition and transparency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malinda
2 months ago
I agree with Benton. It allows for fair competition and transparency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benton
3 months ago
I think competitive tendering would be the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77