Option C is tempting, but I'm not convinced. Tactical ploys are more about gaining an advantage, not necessarily gaining insights into the other party's interests.
I'm not sure about that. Option A seems more plausible - tactical ploys could actually strengthen the other party's position, making the negotiation more adversarial.
Tactical ploys can be used in both distributive and integrative approaches, but I think option B is correct. Integrative negotiation focuses on finding mutual gains, and tactical ploys can help uncover the other party's interests.
Vinnie
2 days agoStefan
6 days agoKenneth
14 days agoLuis
14 days agoFrancesco
16 days agoDierdre
17 days agoAlison
17 days agoYuki
23 days ago