Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIMA Exam CIMAPRO19-P03-1 Topic 5 Question 56 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIMA's CIMAPRO19-P03-1 exam
Question #: 56
Topic #: 5
[All CIMAPRO19-P03-1 Questions]

Which method of quantifying risk exposure can be used to calculate the maximum loss on a portfolio occurring within a period of time with a given probability?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, E, F

Contribute your Thoughts:

Annalee
2 months ago
I was tempted by the simulation option, but Value at Risk is clearly the best answer. It's the industry standard for this type of risk analysis.
upvoted 0 times
Luisa
8 days ago
Regression analysis and Expected value are important too, but Value at Risk is the most widely used method for calculating maximum loss.
upvoted 0 times
...
Starr
10 days ago
Simulation may seem tempting, but Value at Risk is the industry standard for a reason.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucia
17 days ago
I agree, Value at Risk is definitely the way to go for quantifying risk exposure.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dominga
2 months ago
Value at Risk is the way to go. Anything else would be like trying to hit a home run with a toothpick - it's just not the right tool for the job.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenifer
2 months ago
I agree, Value at Risk is the correct answer here. Regression analysis, simulation, and expected value are not designed to calculate maximum loss with a given probability.
upvoted 0 times
Brinda
16 days ago
Yes, Value at Risk is used to calculate maximum loss with a given probability.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
17 days ago
I agree, Value at Risk is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zoila
1 months ago
I think the answer is A) Value at Risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yan
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards option A as well. Value at Risk is a widely used technique in the financial industry for measuring and managing portfolio risk.
upvoted 0 times
Jaime
1 months ago
Regression analysis might be useful too, but I think Value at Risk is more widely used.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
1 months ago
I'm not sure, I think simulation could also be a good method for calculating maximum loss.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timmy
1 months ago
I agree, Value at Risk is commonly used in the financial industry for managing portfolio risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
1 months ago
I think option A, Value at Risk, is the best method for quantifying risk exposure.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tamala
2 months ago
Value at Risk seems like the most appropriate method to calculate maximum loss with a given probability. The question is asking specifically about quantifying risk exposure.
upvoted 0 times
Niesha
1 months ago
C) Simulation
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaclyn
1 months ago
A) Value at Risk
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Isabelle
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) Simulation could also be used to quantify risk exposure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
2 months ago
I agree with Remedios, Value at Risk is used to calculate maximum loss with a given probability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Remedios
3 months ago
I think the answer is A) Value at Risk.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77