D) A project's MIRR will always be higher than its IRR. Well, that's convenient! I guess the finance gods decided to make MIRR the 'above-average' sibling of the IRR family.
B) MIRR favours projects with long payback periods whereas IRR does not. Interesting. I wonder if that means MIRR is better for evaluating long-term investments. Or maybe it just likes to torture project managers with endless calculations.
C) MIRR and IRR will always rank competing projects in the same order. Hmm, I'm not so sure about that. Isn't the whole point of MIRR to provide a different perspective on project ranking compared to IRR?
D) A project's MIRR will always be higher than its IRR. Really? I thought MIRR was supposed to be more conservative than IRR. Guess I need to review the differences between these two metrics.
A) MIRR uses a more realistic reinvestment assumption than IRR. This makes sense to me, as MIRR considers the actual rates at which cash flows can be reinvested, rather than just assuming a constant rate like IRR.
Hildegarde
27 days agoBrendan
11 days agoTheodora
12 days agoAnnamaria
29 days agoRossana
1 months agoMadonna
1 months agoBen
14 days agoBen
16 days agoYolando
1 months agoEdna
1 months agoRossana
1 months agoHildegarde
2 months agoGilbert
19 days agoDenny
24 days agoHuey
28 days agoTresa
29 days ago