Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIMA Exam CIMAPRO19-P01-1 Topic 9 Question 92 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIMA's CIMAPRO19-P01-1 exam
Question #: 92
Topic #: 9
[All CIMAPRO19-P01-1 Questions]

A company manufactures a single product. The cost card for a unit of this product is as follows:

During month 6, finished goods inventory increased by 350 units.

By how much would the profit differ in month 6 if finished goods inventory was valued at standard marginal cost rather than standard absorption cost?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Arlette
2 months ago
Ah, the old standard absorption cost vs. standard marginal cost conundrum. I'm going to need to break out my trusty calculator for this one. Hopefully, I don't end up like the proverbial 'deer in the headlights' on this one!
upvoted 0 times
Glory
2 days ago
User 3: That makes sense, let's double-check the numbers before making a final decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anglea
4 days ago
User 2: I think it's $2,450 higher if we value finished goods inventory at standard marginal cost.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
1 months ago
User 1: Let's calculate the profit difference between standard absorption cost and standard marginal cost.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vallie
2 months ago
Haha, this question is like a trick question! They're trying to catch us out with that fixed cost. I'm going to go with option C) $2,450 lower, just to be on the safe side.
upvoted 0 times
Vonda
10 days ago
I see your point, but I still think option C) $2,450 lower makes more sense in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katheryn
15 days ago
I'm not so sure, I think it might actually be option D) $2,450 higher because of the fixed cost.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erinn
19 days ago
I think you might be right, option C) $2,450 lower does seem like the safer choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jamie
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure about this one. The cost card shows a fixed cost of $50 per unit, so wouldn't the standard absorption cost be higher than the standard marginal cost? I might have to double-check my calculations on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Kenny
4 days ago
User 3: Yes, that's correct. The profit would be $1,050 higher in month 6.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deonna
19 days ago
User 2: So, if the finished goods inventory was valued at standard marginal cost, the profit would be higher, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Maybelle
20 days ago
User 1: I think you're right, the fixed cost per unit would make the standard absorption cost higher.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mignon
29 days ago
User 2: So, if the finished goods inventory was valued at standard marginal cost instead, the profit would be $1,050 higher, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Basilia
1 months ago
User 1: I think you're right, the standard absorption cost would be higher because of the fixed cost per unit.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Salome
2 months ago
But the absorption cost includes fixed overheads, so it would make the profit higher.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawn
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the profit would be lower in that case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
2 months ago
This seems straightforward - the question is asking about the difference in profit if the inventory is valued at standard marginal cost instead of standard absorption cost. I think the answer is B) $1,050 higher.
upvoted 0 times
Carrol
24 days ago
That makes sense. Thanks for explaining.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecilia
26 days ago
Because the finished goods inventory increased by 350 units, so the profit would be higher if valued at standard marginal cost.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
1 months ago
Why do you think it would be higher?
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
2 months ago
I think the answer is B) $1,050 higher.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Salome
3 months ago
I think the profit would be higher if finished goods inventory was valued at standard marginal cost.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77