Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIMA Exam CIMAPRA19-P03-1 Topic 5 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIMA's CIMAPRA19-P03-1 exam
Question #: 28
Topic #: 5
[All CIMAPRA19-P03-1 Questions]

CH makes a popular type of chocolate bar The bars are made on a production line and are scanned for size and shape as they move along the line Wrong sized and misshapen bars are rejected as being poor quality. The scanner detects 90% of poor quality bars. If CH wants to reduce the risk of poor quality bars being sold to the public it can add a further check by a person scanning the production line as well. this check would detect 80% of poor quality bars

If the further check was implemented what percentage of poor quality bars would still get through the checking process?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Evangelina
2 months ago
Ugh, these probability questions always make my head spin. But I'm pretty sure the answer is B) 10%.
upvoted 0 times
Sena
20 days ago
So only 10% of poor quality bars would get through the checking process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaniqua
25 days ago
That makes sense, the further check would catch 80% of the remaining 10%.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
1 months ago
I think you're right, the answer is B) 10%.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gerald
2 months ago
Ha! I bet the people who made this question thought they were being sneaky. But I'm on to them - it's gotta be B) 10%.
upvoted 0 times
Nieves
8 days ago
I'm not sure, but I'll go with B) 10% too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michel
12 days ago
Yeah, I agree. The question seems tricky, but B) 10% makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elsa
1 months ago
I think you're right, it has to be B) 10%.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alex
2 months ago
If the scanner catches 90% and the manual check catches 80% of the poor quality bars, then the remaining 10% and 20% would still get through, right? I'm going with B) 10%.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherman
2 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll need to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
2 months ago
Yes, that's true. The scanner detects 90% and the person detects 80%, so some might still slip through.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeniffer
2 months ago
But wouldn't some poor quality bars still get through even with the additional check?
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
2 months ago
I think adding a person to scan the production line is a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
2 months ago
Yes, that's true. The scanner detects 90% and the person detects 80%, so some might still slip through.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carma
2 months ago
But wouldn't some poor quality bars still get through even with the additional check?
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
2 months ago
I think adding a person to scan the production line is a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77