Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIMA Exam CIMAPRA19-P03-1 Topic 3 Question 38 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIMA's CIMAPRA19-P03-1 exam
Question #: 38
Topic #: 3
[All CIMAPRA19-P03-1 Questions]

A UK manufacturing company has simultaneously:

* purchased a put option to sell USD 1million at an exercise price of GBP1.00 = USD1.65

* sold a call option that grants the option holder the right to buy USD 1million at a price of GBP1.00 = USD1.61(this option has the same maturity date as the put).

Which of the following is a valid explanation for entering into these option positions?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C, E

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lachelle
1 months ago
Alright, folks, no peeking at each other's answers! This isn't a team sport... unless you're planning to start a hedge fund together after the exam.
upvoted 0 times
...
Javier
1 months ago
Ha! These options are like a financial version of 'choose your own adventure.' I'll go with D, but I'm secretly hoping for a hidden 'all of the above' answer.
upvoted 0 times
Lilli
4 days ago
Yeah, D seems like the most logical choice to mitigate any risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carry
8 days ago
I agree, D seems like the safest option to protect against any unexpected changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benton
13 days ago
I think D makes sense, it's all about protecting against the USD strengthening.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bettye
2 months ago
Option C seems a bit too optimistic. The company is probably more concerned with managing their risk than trying to profit from a potential USD appreciation.
upvoted 0 times
Claudio
12 days ago
A: Option C does seem a bit optimistic, they're likely focused on minimizing potential losses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evette
13 days ago
B: I agree, managing risk is probably their main goal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rex
17 days ago
A: I think option D makes more sense. The company wants protection against the USD strengthening.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Makeda
2 months ago
Interesting, I was leaning towards option B at first, but the explanation for option D seems more comprehensive. Gotta pay attention to those details!
upvoted 0 times
Novella
28 days ago
Yeah, paying attention to those details is crucial in these situations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
1 months ago
I agree, option D does seem like a more comprehensive explanation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maddie
1 months ago
Yes, it's important to consider all the details when entering into these option positions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaleesa
1 months ago
I agree, option D does seem to provide more protection against the USD strengthening.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Whitley
2 months ago
Hmm, the key here is the company's expectations. I think option D makes the most sense, as the company wants to protect itself against the USD strengthening beyond a certain point.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
2 months ago
But wouldn't the company want to protect against USD strengthening, so D makes more sense?
upvoted 0 times
...
Clare
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
2 months ago
I think the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
India
2 months ago
But wouldn't the company want to protect against USD strengthening, so D makes more sense?
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
India
3 months ago
I think the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77