Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIMA Exam CIMAPRA19-F01-1 Topic 4 Question 79 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIMA's CIMAPRA19-F01-1 exam
Question #: 79
Topic #: 4
[All CIMAPRA19-F01-1 Questions]

WX is considering an investment in ST.

At 31 December 20X2 ST had the following balances in its statement of financial position:

Which of the following would cause ST to become an associate investment of WX?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Malcom
1 months ago
I think I'll go with option C. It's the only one that really fits the definition of an associate investment. Although, I do wonder if the preference shares in option A might give WX some special rights...
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
1 months ago
Option C looks good, but I'm just hoping my calculator doesn't run out of batteries during the exam!
upvoted 0 times
...
Xenia
1 months ago
I vote for option C. It's the only one that specifically mentions the 'significant influence' requirement for an associate investment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elin
1 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards option C, but I wonder if the preference shares in option A could also make ST an associate investment.
upvoted 0 times
Dortha
5 days ago
Yeah, option D with only preference shares might not be enough to make ST an associate investment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elfrieda
8 days ago
I agree, option C with a higher purchase of equity shares seems more likely to make ST an associate investment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carolynn
17 days ago
I think option B might be too low of a purchase to make ST an associate investment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rupert
18 days ago
Option A seems like a good choice, the mix of equity and preference shares could make ST an associate investment.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kelvin
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Wouldn't option B, purchasing 25,000 equity shares, also give WX a significant influence over ST?
upvoted 0 times
Nelida
18 days ago
A) So, option B is the correct choice in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Inocencia
19 days ago
B) That's correct. Purchasing 25,000 equity shares would give WX significant influence over ST and therefore make it an associate investment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerry
20 days ago
A) No, to become an associate investment, WX needs to have significant influence over ST, which is generally considered to be ownership of 20-50% of the voting shares.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sabra
2 months ago
I think the correct answer is C. Purchasing 75,000 of ST's equity shares would give WX a significant influence over ST, making it an associate investment.
upvoted 0 times
Lavelle
9 days ago
I'm not sure, but I think option B might be too small of an investment to have a significant influence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
13 days ago
I think option A could also be a possibility, as it involves purchasing both equity and preference shares.
upvoted 0 times
...
Letha
15 days ago
C) WX purchases 75,000 of ST's $1 equity shares.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
21 days ago
B) WX purchases 25,000 of ST's $1 equity shares.
upvoted 0 times
...
Octavio
27 days ago
A) WX purchases 15,000 of ST's $1 equity shares and 20,000 of ST's $1 preference shares.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pilar
1 months ago
I agree with you, option C seems to be the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Karl
2 months ago
But A includes both equity and preference shares, which would make ST an associate investment of WX.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josephine
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karl
2 months ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josephine
2 months ago
But A includes both equity and preference shares, which would make ST an associate investment of WX.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josephine
3 months ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77