Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIMA Exam CIMAPRA17-BA2-1 Topic 2 Question 89 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIMA's CIMAPRA17-BA2-1 exam
Question #: 89
Topic #: 2
[All CIMAPRA17-BA2-1 Questions]

Johnson & Smith is a huge corporation with many different departments covering hundreds of activities. They had switched to this new budgeting technique as it seemed as though it would help them allocate their limited funds better.

It was successful to some extent as each manager was required to look at every cost his department accrued. They would then be responsible for coming up with new ways of performing these activities.

It became obvious that certain managers were unable to handle these paperwork intensive demands and so the company will be reverting back to a system that focuses primarily on cost drivers next year.

What budgeting technique will they be using next year?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Julian
2 months ago
Incremental Budgeting? Sounds like they're going for the 'if it ain't broke, don't fix it' approach. Although, with all those managers struggling with the paperwork, maybe they should consider a budgeting system that's a little more 'plug and play'.
upvoted 0 times
Dyan
5 days ago
B) Zero Based Budgeting
upvoted 0 times
...
Colton
6 days ago
I agree, maybe a more straightforward approach would be better for them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
9 days ago
A) Activity Based Budgeting
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgene
10 days ago
Yeah, it seems like they want to simplify things next year.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
11 days ago
C) Incremental Budgeting
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
14 days ago
B) Zero Based Budgeting
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
15 days ago
A) Activity Based Budgeting
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Virgie
2 months ago
I bet the managers at Johnson & Smith are secretly hoping for Incremental Budgeting. It's like the comfy, old slippers of budgeting techniques - familiar and easy to slip into, even if they're a little worn out.
upvoted 0 times
Timothy
16 days ago
I agree, Incremental Budgeting seems like a safe choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
17 days ago
C) Incremental Budgeting
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
20 days ago
B) Zero Based Budgeting
upvoted 0 times
...
Odelia
1 months ago
A) Activity Based Budgeting
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shelba
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think Zero Based Budgeting could also be a good option for them to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronna
2 months ago
Zero Based Budgeting? Sounds like a recipe for disaster. Those managers can't even handle the paperwork for the current system, let alone starting from scratch every year. Incremental Budgeting is the way to go, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
Lou
1 months ago
Incremental Budgeting is definitely a more practical approach for a company like Johnson & Smith.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
2 months ago
I agree, Zero Based Budgeting seems like a lot of work for managers who are already struggling with paperwork.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Clare
2 months ago
I agree with Adria, Incremental Budgeting makes more sense for a large corporation like Johnson & Smith.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derick
2 months ago
Activity Based Budgeting? No way, that's way too complex for a large corporation like Johnson & Smith. They're definitely going with good old Incremental Budgeting - simple and straightforward, just the way they like it.
upvoted 0 times
Joaquin
25 days ago
It makes sense for a large corporation like Johnson & Smith.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucina
1 months ago
Incremental Budgeting is definitely easier to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederic
1 months ago
Yeah, Activity Based Budgeting was too complicated for some managers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonne
2 months ago
I heard Johnson & Smith is going back to Incremental Budgeting next year.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Adria
2 months ago
I think they will be using Incremental Budgeting next year.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77