Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CheckPoint Exam 156-835 Topic 8 Question 37 Discussion

Actual exam question for CheckPoint's 156-835 exam
Question #: 37
Topic #: 8
[All 156-835 Questions]

What cannot be a reason for "Failed to get remote orchestrator interfaces" error message, when clicking on "Orchestrator" in WebUI?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Jovita
29 days ago
This question is like a game of 'Orchestrator Roulette' - you never know which option is going to work!
upvoted 0 times
Malcom
9 days ago
A) Remote orchestrator has no empty interfaces
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Minna
1 months ago
I'm going with Option C. No Sync between orchestrators seems like a pretty straightforward reason for the error message.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
1 months ago
Option B seems a bit confusing. How can you have only one orchestrator if the Orchestrator amount is set to 2? That doesn't make sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
Evangelina
12 days ago
C) No Sync between orchestrators
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
13 days ago
B) One orchestrator only, but Orchestrator amount is 2 or no Sync in between orchestrators
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreta
16 days ago
A) Remote orchestrator has no empty interfaces
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elenore
1 months ago
I think Option D is the correct answer. If there's a single orchestrator environment, but the configured Orchestrator amount is set to 2, that could lead to the 'Failed to get remote orchestrator interfaces' error.
upvoted 0 times
Larae
2 days ago
B) One orchestrator only, but Orchestrator amount is 2 or no Sync in between orchestrators
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
7 days ago
A) Remote orchestrator has no empty interfaces
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stephania
2 months ago
Option A is not correct. If the remote orchestrator has no empty interfaces, it should still be able to connect to the WebUI.
upvoted 0 times
Lakeesha
1 months ago
That's true, option A cannot be the reason for the error message.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordell
1 months ago
D) Single orchestrator environment, but configured Orchestrator amount is 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Agustin
1 months ago
C) No Sync between orchestrators
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
1 months ago
B) One orchestrator only, but Orchestrator amount is 2 or no Sync in between orchestrators
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
2 months ago
A) Remote orchestrator has no empty interfaces
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paris
2 months ago
I see your point, but I think option C) No Sync between orchestrators could also be a valid reason for the error message.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elly
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the issue might be option B) One orchestrator only, but Orchestrator amount is 2 or no Sync in between orchestrators.
upvoted 0 times
...
Owen
3 months ago
I think the reason could be option A) Remote orchestrator has no empty interfaces.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77