Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CheckPoint Exam 156-315.80 Topic 2 Question 43 Discussion

Actual exam question for CheckPoint's 156-315.80 exam
Question #: 43
Topic #: 2
[All 156-315.80 Questions]

Vanessa is expecting a very important Security Report. The Document should be sent as an attachment via e-mail. An e-mail with Security_report.pdf file was delivered to her e-mail inbox. When she opened the PDF file, she noticed that the file is basically empty and only few lines of text are in it. The report is missing some graphs, tables and links.

Which component of SandBlast protection is her company using on a Gateway?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Freeman
4 days ago
I'm torn between SandBlast Agent and SandBlast Threat Extraction. The question mentions a 'Security Report', so it could be the agent that's responsible for the issue. Or maybe the threat extraction just didn't do its job properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
16 days ago
I'm going with SandBlast Threat Emulation. The file being empty and only having a few lines of text sounds like it could be a result of the threat emulation process catching something suspicious.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
16 days ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'm pretty sure the answer is SandBlast Threat Extraction, since the file was delivered but missing important content. That's a classic sign of a threat extraction issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darnell
20 days ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be Check Point Protect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Major
24 days ago
I believe they are using SandBlast Threat Emulation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
26 days ago
I think her company is using SandBlast Threat Extraction.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77