Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CheckPoint Exam 156-215.81 Topic 5 Question 49 Discussion

Actual exam question for CheckPoint's 156-215.81 exam
Question #: 49
Topic #: 5
[All 156-215.81 Questions]

Contribute your Thoughts:

Elvera
1 months ago
I bet the correct answer involves a magic spell and a unicorn. Just kidding, but a man can dream, right?
upvoted 0 times
Tijuana
1 days ago
D) A complete CLI and API interface for Management with 3rd Party integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Remona
12 days ago
B) A complete CLI and API interface using SSH and custom CPCode integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
1 months ago
A) 3rd Party integration of CLI and API for Gateways prior to R80.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ruby
2 months ago
Ooh, a complete CLI and API interface for Management with 3rd Party integration? Sign me up!
upvoted 0 times
Yuki
18 days ago
User3: I find it more efficient than using SmartConsole for certain tasks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lera
22 days ago
User2: Yeah, it definitely makes managing objects and rules easier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joaquin
1 months ago
User1: I prefer using the complete CLI and API interface for Management with 3rd Party integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ivette
2 months ago
I like the idea of using SSH and custom CPCode integration. Seems more straightforward than dealing with 3rd parties.
upvoted 0 times
Alecia
4 days ago
Leeann: Different preferences, but all options have their benefits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blondell
5 days ago
User 3: I find 3rd party integration of CLI and API for Gateways prior to R80 useful.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leeann
8 days ago
User 2: I prefer using a complete CLI and API interface for Management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgilio
30 days ago
User 1: I agree, SSH and custom CPCode integration sounds efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ula
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about the 3rd party integrations for Gateways prior to R80. Sounds a bit outdated to me.
upvoted 0 times
Shaun
1 months ago
User 2: Yeah, that sounds like the most up-to-date and efficient way to modify objects and rules in R80 Management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desiree
1 months ago
User 1: I think option D is the way to go, a complete CLI and API interface for Management with 3rd Party integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Reita
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think B could also be a possibility since it mentions a CLI and API interface using SSH and custom CPCode integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katy
2 months ago
Wait, so we can use a complete CLI and API interface for Management? That's super handy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
2 months ago
I agree with Elouise, D seems like the most logical choice for modifying objects or rules in R80 Management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elouise
3 months ago
I think the answer is D, because it mentions a complete CLI and API interface for Management with 3rd Party integration.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77