Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CFA Institute Exam CFA-Level-II Topic 3 Question 66 Discussion

Actual exam question for CFA Institute's CFA-Level-II exam
Question #: 66
Topic #: 3
[All CFA-Level-II Questions]

Factor Analytics Capital Management makes portfolio recommendations using various factor models. Mauricio Rodriguez, a Factor Analytics research analyst, is examining the prospects of two portfolios, the FACM Century Fund (CF) and the FACM Esquire Fund (EF).

The variance of returns are identical for the two funds. The estimates in Exhibit 1 were derived for CF and EF using monthly data for the past five years.

Supervisor Barbara Woodson asks Rodriguez to use the Capita! Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and a multifactor model (APT) to make a decision to continue or discontinue the EF fund. The two factors in the multifactor model are not identified. To help with the decision, Woodson provides Rodriguez with the capital market forecasts in Exhibit 2.

After examining the prospects for the EF portfolio, Rodriguez derives the forecasts in Exhibit 3.

Rodriguez also develops a 2-factor macroeconomic factor model for the EF portfolio. The two factors used in the model are the surprise in GDP growth and the surprise in Investor Sentiment. The equation for the macro factor model is:

During an investment committee meeting, Woodson makes the following statements related to the 2-factor macroeconomic factor model.

Statement 1: An investment combination in CF and EF that provides a GDP growth factor beta equal to one and an Investor Sentiment factor beta equal to zero will have lower active factor risk than a tracking portfolio consisting of CF and EF.

Statement 2: When markets are in equilibrium, no combination of CF and EF will produce an arbitrage opportunity

In their final meeting, Rodriguez informs Woodson that the CF portfolio consistently outperformed its benchmark over the past five years. Rodriguez makes the following comments to Woodson: "The consistency with which CF outperformed its benchmark is amazing. The difference between the CF monthly return and its benchmark return was nearly always positive and varied little over time."

Using the market model estimates for CF and EF, which fund has higher:

Systematic risk? Unsystematic risk?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Funded status equals fair value of plan assets minus PBO (395 - 635 = -240). (Study Session 6, LOS 22.c,f)


Contribute your Thoughts:

Kina
1 months ago
I love how Woodson is throwing around terms like 'arbitrage opportunity' and 'active factor risk' - makes me feel like I'm in a finance version of the Da Vinci Code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
1 months ago
Wait, so the CF fund consistently outperformed its benchmark, but we're still considering discontinuing the EF fund? Sounds like someone needs to check their math and make sure they're not missing something here.
upvoted 0 times
Kerrie
22 hours ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
Temeka
1 days ago
Woodson: Statement 1 suggests a combination of CF and EF with specific factor betas can reduce active factor risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christa
2 days ago
Rodriguez: The CF fund has been performing well, but we need to analyze the systematic and unsystematic risk for both CF and EF.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
5 days ago
Woodson: Rodriguez, we need to make a decision on the EF fund. Let's use the CAPM and APT models.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
10 days ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Tenesha
20 days ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dacia
2 months ago
Interesting that the two funds have identical variances of returns, yet different systematic and unsystematic risks. The CAPM and APT models should help provide more clarity on the underlying factors driving the performance of these funds.
upvoted 0 times
Lettie
14 days ago
User 3
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefanie
18 days ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Dong
1 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Raul
2 months ago
But what about unsystematic risk? Could EF have higher unsystematic risk due to its underperformance?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
2 months ago
The CF portfolio has higher systematic risk, as evidenced by the higher beta value compared to the EF portfolio. However, the unsystematic risk seems to be higher for the EF portfolio, based on the larger variance of returns.
upvoted 0 times
Isidra
26 days ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
28 days ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Audrie
2 months ago
I agree with you, Lera. CF's consistent outperformance indicates higher systematic risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lera
3 months ago
I think CF has higher systematic risk because it consistently outperformed its benchmark.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77