Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CFA Institute Exam CFA-Level-II Topic 2 Question 74 Discussion

Actual exam question for CFA Institute's CFA-Level-II exam
Question #: 74
Topic #: 2
[All CFA-Level-II Questions]

Lauren Jacobs, CFA, is an equity analyst for DF Investments. She is evaluating Iron Parts Inc. Iron Parts is a manufacturer of interior systems and components for automobiles. The company is the world's second largest original equipment auto parts supplier, with a market capitalization of $1.8 billion. Based on Iron Parts's low price-to-book value ratio of 0.9* and low price-to-sales ratio of 0.15x, Jacobs believes the stock could be an interesting investment. However, she wants to review the disclosures found in the company's financial footnotes. In particular, Jacobs is concerned about Iron Parts's defined benefit pension plan. The following information for 2007 and 2008 is provided.

Iron Parts has adopted SFAS No. 158, Employers' Accounting for Defined Benefit Pensions and Other Postretirement Plans.

Jacobs wants to fully understand the impact of changing pension assumptions on Iron Parts's balance sheet and income statement. In addition, she would like to compute Iron Parts's economic pension expense.

As of December 31, 2008, the funded status of Iron Parts's pension plan was:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Funded status equals fair value of plan assets minus PBO (395 - 635 = -240). (Study Session 6, LOS 22.c,f)


Contribute your Thoughts:

Huey
12 months ago
I calculated the economic pension expense for Iron Parts and it seems like a risky investment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
12 months ago
I think it might actually be $240 million underfunded based on the information provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dewitt
12 months ago
I believe the funded status of Iron Parts's pension plan was $175 million underfunded.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
12 months ago
Yeah, I agree. It's important to fully understand the impact of changing pension assumptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dewitt
1 years ago
I think the question about Iron Parts Inc.'s pension plan is quite tricky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amina
1 years ago
I agree with Emeline and B. The underfunded amount is likely $240 million based on the information provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbie
1 years ago
I disagree, I think the answer is A) $175 million underfunded. The numbers are quite concerning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
1 years ago
I also believe it is B) $240 million underfunded. The pension plan seems to be in a bad shape.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emeline
1 years ago
I think the answer is B) $240 million underfunded.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77