Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CFA Institute Exam CFA-Level-II Topic 1 Question 67 Discussion

Actual exam question for CFA Institute's CFA-Level-II exam
Question #: 67
Topic #: 1
[All CFA-Level-II Questions]

Michael Thomas, CFA, is a fixed-income portfolio manager for TFC Investments. As part of his portfolio strategy for the Prosperity Fund, Thomas searches for companies that he expects to be upgraded or downgraded. Those potential upgrades he finds are added to the portfolio or if already in the portfolio are increased in proportion to other holdings before the upgrade takes place. Potential downgrades are sold from the portfolio before the downgrade takes place. Thomas is evaluating his portfolio's current holdings which include several bonds issued by companies in the oil and gas exploration and refining industries. Year-end rating updates are expected to occur in a few days and Thomas is preparing to adjust his portfolio based on expected changes in credit ratings. He has assembled the following annual data on four of the oil and gas stocks in the portfolio:

Exhibit: 1

Thomas has been discussing his fixed-income strategies with a fellow portfolio manager, Shawna Reese. Reese has indicated that while his initial approach is good, the overall credit analysis strategy could be improved and has made the following suggestions to Thomas for both the Prosperity Fund and other fixed-income funds he manages:

* The current methodology does not consider special issues related to high-yield debt which makes up approximately 5% of the Prosperity Fund. Because most high-yield issuers have such a heavy dependence on short-term debt financing, analysis of the firm's debt structure will be extremely important to determine the priority of claims on the firm's assets as well as what source(s) of funds will be used to repay the principal. In addition, the corporate structure of high-yield issuers must be examined to determine the issuer's access to cash flows generated by its subsidiaries. A simple analysis of the parent's financial ratios will not reveal complicated corporate structures and indebtedness of subsidiaries that may restrict the issuer's ability to obtain the cash flows necessary to service its debt.

* The current methodology as applied to the Municipal Opportunities Fund does not include the necessary specialized analysis for municipal securities. Among other items, tax-backed munis must be scrutinized as to the issuer's ability to maintain balanced budgets as well as to ensure that the issue has first priority of claims to revenue from public works projects. Revenue-backed munis require an assessment of the sufficiency of rate covenants to cover expenses and debt servicing of the underlying project as well as the ability for other government entities to access the revenues generated by the enterprise before they are passed on to revenue bondholders.

As part of his portfolio analysis, Thomas also examines yield volatility. Thomas makes the following statements:

Statement 1: Implied yield volatility estimates are based on the assumptions that the option pricing model is correct and that volatility is constant.

Statement 2: Yield volatility has been observed to follow patterns over time that can be modeled and used to forecast future volatility.

He concludes his analysis by comparing the swap rate curve to a government bond yield curve as a benchmark.

Which of Thomas's statements concerning yield volatility are correct?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

First, calculate the continuously compounded risk-free rate as ln( 1.040811) = 4% and then calculate the theoretically correct futures price as follows:

Then, compare the theoretical price to the observed market price: 1.035 - 1,025 = 10. The futures contract is overpriced. To take advantage of the arbitrage opportunity, the investor should sell the (overpriced) futures contract and buy the underlying asset (the equity index) using borrowed funds. Norris has suggested the opposite. (Study Session 16, LOS 59.f)


Contribute your Thoughts:

King
1 months ago
I'm a bit skeptical of the option pricing model assumptions, so I'm leaning towards B. Forecasting volatility based on past patterns seems like a safer bet to me. Hey, at least it's not as complex as figuring out corporate structures for high-yield debt, right?
upvoted 0 times
Nikita
3 days ago
Definitely, it's a more practical approach. Dealing with corporate structures for high-yield debt sounds like a headache.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
7 days ago
I agree, Statement 2 seems more reliable. Forecasting based on past patterns is a common practice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nikita
11 days ago
Definitely, it's always good to rely on historical data. Corporate structures can be a headache to analyze.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marjory
14 days ago
I agree, Statement 2 seems more reliable. Forecasting based on past patterns makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sophia
1 months ago
I'm going with C. Both statements make sense, though the second one is more intuitive to me. Yield volatility ain't no mystery, it's a pattern you can dance to!
upvoted 0 times
Reiko
23 hours ago
Definitely, comparing the swap rate curve to a government bond yield curve can provide valuable insights.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
2 days ago
Yeah, it's important to consider the assumptions behind the implied yield volatility estimates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zoila
4 days ago
I agree, both statements seem valid. Understanding yield volatility is crucial for portfolio analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dan
2 months ago
Both statements seem reasonable to me. The option pricing model assumptions may not always hold, but implied volatility is still a useful starting point. And the time-series patterns in yield volatility can definitely help with forecasting.
upvoted 0 times
Son
16 days ago
It's important to consider both aspects when analyzing yield volatility in the portfolio. Thomas seems to have a good handle on this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marci
19 days ago
Yes, and looking at patterns in yield volatility over time can definitely help us forecast future volatility in the market.
upvoted 0 times
...
Winifred
1 months ago
I agree, the option pricing model assumptions may not always be perfect, but they can still provide a good estimate of implied yield volatility.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pamella
2 months ago
I think Statement 2 is correct. Yield volatility does exhibit patterns over time that can be used to forecast future volatility. The option pricing model assumptions are a bit more questionable in my opinion.
upvoted 0 times
Lorriane
28 days ago
I think both statements could be useful in analyzing yield volatility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennie
1 months ago
I agree, Statement 2 seems more reliable for forecasting yield volatility.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Allene
2 months ago
I'm not sure about the answer, but I think we should consider both statements carefully before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katlyn
2 months ago
I agree with you, Corazon. Statement 2 seems more accurate based on Thomas's analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corazon
3 months ago
I think the correct answer is B) Statement 2 only.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77