Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CertNexus Exam ITS-110 Topic 3 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for CertNexus's ITS-110 exam
Question #: 41
Topic #: 3
[All ITS-110 Questions]

Which of the following is one way to implement countermeasures on an IoT gateway to ensure physical security?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

D is such a cop-out. Software-based security? Come on, that's like trying to keep a hungry bear out of your fridge with a cardboard box. Give me some good old-fashioned hardware security any day!
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
9 days ago
I think B is the best choice here. Limiting physical access to the ports is crucial for IoT gateways. Who wants a hacker to just walk up and plug in a USB drive?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacki
12 days ago
A and B sound like good options to prevent physical tampering. I'm not sure about C though, wouldn't that open up security vulnerabilities?
upvoted 0 times
...
Salley
17 days ago
I believe option B is also important to limit physical access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felice
18 days ago
I agree with Bettina, tamper detection is crucial for physical security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
20 days ago
I think option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77