Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CertNexus Exam ITS-110 Topic 2 Question 56 Discussion

Actual exam question for CertNexus's ITS-110 exam
Question #: 56
Topic #: 2
[All ITS-110 Questions]

Which of the following methods or technologies is most likely to be used to protect an IoT portal against protocol fuzzing?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Huey
4 days ago
I think option D) Hash-based Message Authentication Code (HMAC) could also be a good choice to ensure data integrity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domonique
15 days ago
Fuzzing an IoT portal? That's like trying to break into a digital birdhouse. I'd just leave it alone and let the birds tweet in peace.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
17 days ago
But HTTPS encrypts the communication, making it harder for attackers to manipulate the protocol.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlean
1 months ago
PKI is great for authentication, but it's not specifically designed to defend against protocol fuzzing. I'd go with NGFW.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
1 months ago
HTTPS is a must-have, but it alone may not be enough to protect against sophisticated fuzzing attacks.
upvoted 0 times
Valentin
17 days ago
A) Secure Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTPS) is important, but we also need additional security measures.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Titus
1 months ago
HMAC is a good option too. It can help validate the integrity of messages and prevent unauthorized modifications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
1 months ago
I think NGFW would be the best choice here. It can provide advanced protocol inspection and filtering to protect against fuzzing attacks.
upvoted 0 times
Willard
14 days ago
HMAC could also be useful for protecting against fuzzing attacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yesenia
24 days ago
I agree, NGFW can provide advanced protocol inspection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
25 days ago
NGFW is a good choice for protecting against protocol fuzzing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vincent
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C) Next-Generation Firewall (NGFW) would provide better protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
2 months ago
I think option A) Secure Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTPS) would be the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77