Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CertNexus Exam ITS-110 Topic 2 Question 47 Discussion

Actual exam question for CertNexus's ITS-110 exam
Question #: 47
Topic #: 2
[All ITS-110 Questions]

An IoT security administrator is concerned that someone could physically connect to his network and scan for vulnerable devices. Which of the following solutions should he install to prevent this kind of attack?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lawanda
3 days ago
HIDS might be a good option too, but NAC is probably the most comprehensive solution to address the administrator's specific concerns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
11 days ago
I'm torn between NAC and NIDS, but I think NAC would be more effective in this scenario to control who and what can connect to the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
16 days ago
Network Access Control (NAC) seems like the best solution to prevent unauthorized physical access and device scanning on the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
18 days ago
I believe Host Intrusion Detection System (HIDS) could also be a good solution to detect any suspicious activity on individual devices within the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
20 days ago
I agree with Evette. NAC can help restrict access to the network based on user identity and device security posture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evette
21 days ago
I think the IoT security administrator should install Network Access Control (NAC) to prevent unauthorized physical connections.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77