CertNexus Exam ITS-110 Topic 2 Question 47 Discussion

Actual exam question for CertNexus's ITS-110 exam

Question #: 47
Topic #: 2

An IoT security administrator is concerned that someone could physically connect to his network and scan for vulnerable devices. Which of the following solutions should he install to prevent this kind of attack?

AMedia Access Control (MAC)

BNetwork Access Control (NAC)

CHost Intrusion Detection System (HIDS)

DNetwork Intrusion Detection System (NIDS)

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Alethea at Oct 22, 2024, 04:16 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ITS-110 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Royce

1 months ago

NAC all the way! Can't go wrong with that. Although, I hear NIDS is great for catching hackers in the act. Maybe a combo platter would be tastier?

upvoted 0 times

Willis

3 days ago

I agree, NIDS can be really effective at detecting suspicious activity on the network.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delmy

8 days ago

NAC is definitely a solid choice for preventing unauthorized access.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lawanda

2 months ago

HIDS might be a good option too, but NAC is probably the most comprehensive solution to address the administrator's specific concerns.

upvoted 0 times

Leota

19 days ago

HIDS might be a good option too, but NAC is probably the most comprehensive solution to address the administrator's specific concerns.

upvoted 0 times

...

India

1 months ago

NAC can help restrict access to the network based on certain criteria.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elden

1 months ago

I think NAC would be the best solution to prevent unauthorized physical connections.

upvoted 0 times

...

Catalina

2 months ago

I'm torn between NAC and NIDS, but I think NAC would be more effective in this scenario to control who and what can connect to the network.

upvoted 0 times

Iesha

1 months ago

NIDS could also be useful in detecting any suspicious activity once someone is already connected.

upvoted 0 times

...

Howard

2 months ago

I agree, NAC would definitely help in controlling access to the network.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arthur

2 months ago

Network Access Control (NAC) seems like the best solution to prevent unauthorized physical access and device scanning on the network.

upvoted 0 times

Cyril

20 days ago

User 4: NAC is more focused on controlling access to the network, while HIDS is more for detecting unauthorized activities within a specific host.

upvoted 0 times

...

Josefa

21 days ago

User 3: What about Host Intrusion Detection System (HIDS)? Would that be a good solution as well?

upvoted 0 times

...

Mike

1 months ago

User 2: Agreed, NAC would definitely help in preventing someone from scanning for vulnerable devices.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carma

1 months ago

User 1: I think we should install Network Access Control (NAC) to prevent unauthorized physical access.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dahlia

2 months ago

I believe Host Intrusion Detection System (HIDS) could also be a good solution to detect any suspicious activity on individual devices within the network.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorthy

2 months ago

I agree with Evette. NAC can help restrict access to the network based on user identity and device security posture.

upvoted 0 times

...

Evette

2 months ago

I think the IoT security administrator should install Network Access Control (NAC) to prevent unauthorized physical connections.

upvoted 0 times

...