Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CertNexus Exam ITS-110 Topic 1 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for CertNexus's ITS-110 exam
Question #: 39
Topic #: 1
[All ITS-110 Questions]

An IoT security architect wants to implement Bluetooth between two nodes. The Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman (ECDH) cipher suite has been identified as a requirement. Which of the following Bluetooth versions can meet this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Willodean
1 months ago
Bluetooth versions and their cipher suites? Now that's what I call a party trick! B is the answer, but I'm more impressed by your ability to make this sound exciting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eliz
1 months ago
Ah, the age-old question: which Bluetooth version can handle my fancy ECDH needs? I say we just go with the latest and greatest - BLE v4.2 is the way to go, my friends.
upvoted 0 times
...
Albina
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm pretty sure any of the BLE versions can handle ECDH. Bluetooth is all about being flexible, you know? D seems like the obvious pick to me.
upvoted 0 times
Suzan
12 days ago
User 2: Yeah, Bluetooth is designed to be flexible like that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicidad
17 days ago
User 1: I think D is the right choice, any BLE version should work with ECDH.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lucille
1 months ago
Wait, is ECDH the same as Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA)? I'm a bit confused, but I think B is the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
Launa
2 days ago
Iluminada: BLE v4.2 is the version that supports ECDH. It's the best choice for implementing Bluetooth with ECDH.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
4 days ago
User 2: Thanks for clarifying. So, which Bluetooth version supports ECDH?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
6 days ago
User 1: No, ECDH and ECDSA are different. ECDH is for key exchange while ECDSA is for digital signatures.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lottie
2 months ago
BLE v4.2 is the answer! It supports ECDH, which is exactly what the IoT security architect needs.
upvoted 0 times
Audria
6 days ago
D) Any of the BLE versions
upvoted 0 times
...
Leana
8 days ago
BLE v4.2 is the answer! It supports ECDH, which is exactly what the IoT security architect needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
13 days ago
D) Any of the BLE versions
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerrie
14 days ago
C) BLE v4.1
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
19 days ago
C) BLE v4.1
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
1 months ago
B) BLE v4.2
upvoted 0 times
...
Roy
1 months ago
B) BLE v4.2
upvoted 0 times
...
Fatima
1 months ago
A) Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) v4.0
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
2 months ago
A) Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) v4.0
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Delsie
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think D) Any of the BLE versions could also work for this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassi
2 months ago
I agree with Aracelis, BLE v4.2 is the right choice for implementing Bluetooth with ECDH.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aracelis
2 months ago
I think the answer is B) BLE v4.2 because it supports the ECDH cipher suite.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77