CertNexus Exam ITS-110 Topic 1 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for CertNexus's ITS-110 exam

Question #: 25
Topic #: 1

[All ITS-110 Questions]

Network filters based on Ethernet burned-in-addresses are vulnerable to which of the following attacks?

AMedia Access Control (MAC) spoofing

BBuffer overflow

CPacket injection

DGPS spoofing

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by James at Jan 26, 2024, 07:46 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ITS-110 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Willard

1 months ago

Packet injection? More like packet confusion if you ask me. This is a piece of cake, MAC spoofing all the way!

upvoted 0 times

Emmett

2 days ago

Packet injection may cause confusion, but MAC spoofing is the real danger here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Domitila

4 days ago

I agree, MAC spoofing is a serious threat to Ethernet burned-in-address filters.

upvoted 0 times

...

Avery

24 days ago

MAC spoofing is definitely the way to go. It's the most common attack on network filters.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kate

2 months ago

GPS spoofing? What does that have to do with Ethernet filters? I think the exam writers are trying to be a little too creative with the distractors.

upvoted 0 times

Tonette

1 months ago

C) Packet injection

upvoted 0 times

...

Eun

1 months ago

B) Buffer overflow

upvoted 0 times

...

Charolette

1 months ago

A) Media Access Control (MAC) spoofing

upvoted 0 times

...

Bernardine

2 months ago

Buffer overflow? Really? That's like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. MAC spoofing is the obvious choice here.

upvoted 0 times

Dean

18 days ago

Yeah, MAC spoofing is the most logical choice to exploit vulnerabilities in network filters based on Ethernet burned-in-addresses.

upvoted 0 times

...

Colette

1 months ago

I agree, using MAC spoofing is a more targeted and effective way to bypass Ethernet burned-in-address filters.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lenna

1 months ago

Buffer overflow might be too extreme for this situation. MAC spoofing is a more subtle approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cordell

2 months ago

MAC spoofing is definitely the way to go. It's a common attack on network filters.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stefania

2 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think C) Packet injection could also be a possible attack on network filters.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cortney

2 months ago

I've seen MAC spoofing attacks in action, and they can be pretty nasty. This is a good question to test our network security knowledge.

upvoted 0 times

Josephine

25 days ago

C) Packet injection

upvoted 0 times

...

Dylan

1 months ago

A) Media Access Control (MAC) spoofing

upvoted 0 times

...

Kandis

1 months ago

C) Packet injection

upvoted 0 times

...

Leontine

2 months ago

A) Media Access Control (MAC) spoofing

upvoted 0 times

...

Johanna

2 months ago

I agree with Rebecka, because changing the MAC address can bypass network filters.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kara

2 months ago

MAC spoofing is definitely the right answer here. Ethernet filters are easy to bypass if you can just fake the MAC address.

upvoted 0 times

Twanna

24 days ago

Exactly, MAC spoofing is a major vulnerability in Ethernet-based network filters.

upvoted 0 times

...

Patria

28 days ago

So, the answer to the question is A) Media Access Control (MAC) spoofing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marci

1 months ago

It's true, faking the MAC address can easily bypass Ethernet filters.

upvoted 0 times

...

Katy

1 months ago

MAC spoofing is a common attack on network filters.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rebecka

3 months ago

I think the answer is A) MAC spoofing.

upvoted 0 times

...