Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CertNexus Exam CFR-410 Topic 3 Question 19 Discussion

Actual exam question for CertNexus's CFR-410 exam
Question #: 19
Topic #: 3
[All CFR-410 Questions]

An incident response team is concerned with verifying the integrity of security information and event

management (SIEM) events after being written to disk. Which of the following represents the BEST option for addressing this concern?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Rolland
1 months ago
Hey, has anyone tried turning the SIEM off and on again? That's usually the first step, right? No? Okay, log hashing it is, then.
upvoted 0 times
Gianna
5 days ago
Source validation can also help ensure the accuracy of SIEM events.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
16 days ago
Log hashing is important for verifying the integrity of security information and events.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tarra
17 days ago
Log hashing helps verify the integrity of security information and events written to disk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawnda
19 days ago
No, turning it off and on again is not the best option. Log hashing is a better choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
1 months ago
No, turning it off and on again is not the best option. Log hashing is a better choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tarra
2 months ago
Log hashing, hands down. It's the digital equivalent of a crime scene investigator dusting for fingerprints. Nailed it!
upvoted 0 times
Kasandra
13 days ago
Source validation is good, but log hashing is like the final piece of the puzzle in verifying SIEM events.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
1 months ago
Time synchronization is important too, but log hashing is like finding the smoking gun.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hildred
1 months ago
Log hashing is definitely the way to go. It ensures the integrity of the security information.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chantay
2 months ago
Field name consistency? Really? That's like trying to organize a box of spaghetti. Log hashing is the only option that makes sense here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodrigo
2 months ago
Source validation? Psh, that's like trying to find a needle in a haystack. Log hashing is the way to go, it's the Sherlock Holmes of the SIEM world.
upvoted 0 times
Shizue
15 days ago
I agree, log hashing can help verify the integrity of SIEM events.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dong
16 days ago
Log hashing is definitely the way to go, it's like Sherlock Holmes!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
23 days ago
Time synchronization is important, but log hashing really takes the cake when it comes to verifying the integrity of security information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
29 days ago
Source validation can be like searching for a needle in a haystack, but log hashing is more like having a magnifying glass to spot any inconsistencies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
1 months ago
I agree, log hashing can provide that extra layer of security and verification.
upvoted 0 times
...
Burma
2 months ago
Log hashing is definitely the way to go, it's like having a detective for your security events.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Latanya
2 months ago
Time synchronization? Nah, that's like trying to catch a speeding bullet with a butterfly net. Log hashing is where it's at!
upvoted 0 times
Marget
1 months ago
I agree, time synchronization can be unreliable. Log hashing provides a more secure option for verifying SIEM events.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
1 months ago
Log hashing is definitely the way to go. It ensures the integrity of the security information.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lizette
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) Source validation could also be a good option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
2 months ago
I agree with Sol, log hashing can help verify the integrity of SIEM events.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sol
3 months ago
I think the best option is B) Log hashing.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77